Harrower A D
Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(10):676-80. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109650.
Diabetic control was compared in groups of Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients treated concurrently for 1 year with five different sulphonylurea drugs: chlorpropamide (21), glipizide (24), gliquidone (22), gliclazide (22) and glibenclamide (23). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1) levels decreased in all groups over the first 2 months, but tended to level off or increase thereafter. In a total of 96 patients assessed after 1 year, gliclazide produced normal HbA1 levels in a significantly greater number of patients than chlorpropamide (p = 0.01) and gliquidone (p = 0.038), and glibenclamide was also significantly better than chlorpropamide (p = 0.02). Significant improvements in HbA1 were produced overall in the gliquidone (p less than 0.01), gliclazide (p less than 0.01) and glibenclamide (p less than 0.02) groups and the gliquidone and gliclazide groups were significantly better than the glipizide group (p less than 0.01 in both cases). Only the glibenclamide group had a significant change in weight (p less than 0.05). There may be differences between different sulphonylureas which could be of clinical advantage in certain patients.
对2型(非胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病患者分组进行比较,这些患者同时接受5种不同磺脲类药物治疗1年,药物分别为:氯磺丙脲(21例)、格列吡嗪(24例)、格列喹酮(22例)、格列齐特(22例)和格列本脲(23例)。在最初2个月里,所有组糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)水平均下降,但此后趋于平稳或上升。在1年后评估的总共96例患者中,格列齐特使HbA1水平正常的患者数量显著多于氯磺丙脲(p = 0.01)和格列喹酮(p = 0.038),格列本脲也显著优于氯磺丙脲(p = 0.02)。格列喹酮组(p < 0.01)、格列齐特组(p < 0.01)和格列本脲组(p < 0.02)的HbA1总体有显著改善,且格列喹酮组和格列齐特组显著优于格列吡嗪组(两种情况p均 < 0.01)。只有格列本脲组体重有显著变化(p < 0.05)。不同磺脲类药物之间可能存在差异,这在某些患者中可能具有临床优势。