Suppr超能文献

格列齐特治疗2型糖尿病的安全性和有效性:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Safety and efficacy of gliclazide as treatment for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Landman Gijs W D, de Bock Geertruide H, van Hateren Kornelis J J, van Dijk Peter R, Groenier Klaas H, Gans Rijk O B, Houweling Sebastiaan T, Bilo Henk J G, Kleefstra Nanne

机构信息

Diabetes Centre Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e82880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082880. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

Gliclazide has been associated with a low risk of hypoglycemic episodes and beneficial long-term cardiovascular safety in observational cohorts. The aim of this study was to assess in a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials the safety and efficacy of gliclazide compared to other oral glucose-lowering agents (PROSPERO2013:CRD42013004156).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Trialregister.nl, Clinicaltrialsregister.eu and the Cochrane database.

SELECTION

Included were randomized studies of at least 12 weeks duration with the following outcomes: HbA1c change, incidence of severe hypoglycemia, weight change, cardiovascular events and/or mortality when comparing gliclazide with other oral blood glucose lowering drugs. Bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The inverse variance random effects model was used.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials were included; 3,083 patients treated with gliclazide and 3,155 patients treated with other oral blood glucose lowering drugs. There was a considerable amount of heterogeneity between and bias in studies. Compared to other glucose lowering agents except metformin, gliclazide was slightly more effective (-0.13% (95%CI: -0.25, -0.02, I(2) 55%)). One out of 2,387 gliclazide users experienced a severe hypoglycemic event, whilst also using insulin. There were 25 confirmed non-severe hypoglycemic events (2.2%) in 1,152 gliclazide users and 22 events (1.8%) in 1,163 patients in the comparator group (risk ratio 1.09 (95% CI: 0.20, 5.78, I² 77%)). Few studies reported differences in weight and none were designed to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of randomized trials comparing gliclazide to other oral glucose lowering agents was poor and effect estimates on weight were limited by publication bias. The number of severe hypoglycemic episodes was extremely low, and gliclazide appears at least equally effective compared to other glucose lowering agents. None of the trials were designed for evaluating cardiovascular outcomes, which warrants attention in future randomized trials.

摘要

目的与设计

在观察性队列研究中,格列齐特与低血糖发作风险低以及长期心血管安全性良好相关。本研究的目的是通过对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估格列齐特与其他口服降糖药相比的安全性和有效性(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库编号:CRD42013004156)。

数据来源

医学文献数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库(Clinicaltrials.gov)、荷兰试验注册库(Trialregister.nl)、欧盟临床试验注册库(Clinicaltrialsregister.eu)以及考克兰系统评价数据库。

入选标准

纳入至少为期12周的随机研究,其观察指标如下:比较格列齐特与其他口服降糖药时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化、严重低血糖发生率、体重变化、心血管事件和/或死亡率。采用考克兰偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。使用逆方差随机效应模型。

结果

共纳入19项试验;3083例患者接受格列齐特治疗,3155例患者接受其他口服降糖药治疗。研究之间存在相当大的异质性和偏倚。与除二甲双胍以外的其他降糖药相比,格列齐特的疗效略好(-0.13%(95%置信区间:-0.25,-0.02,I²=55%))。在2387例格列齐特使用者中,有1例同时使用胰岛素的患者发生了严重低血糖事件。1152例格列齐特使用者中有25例确诊的非严重低血糖事件(2.2%),对照组1163例患者中有22例(1.8%)(风险比1.09(95%置信区间:0.20,5.78,I²=77%))。很少有研究报告体重差异,且无一研究旨在评估心血管结局。

结论

比较格列齐特与其他口服降糖药的随机试验的方法学质量较差,关于体重的效应估计受发表偏倚影响而受限。严重低血糖发作次数极低,格列齐特与其他降糖药相比似乎至少同样有效。没有一项试验旨在评估心血管结局,这在未来的随机试验中值得关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e799/3922704/c83b56831b95/pone.0082880.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验