CT-based measurement and analysis of distal humerus morphology in healthy adults from Northern China.

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the morphological characteristics of the distal humerus in healthy adults from northern China using computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques and compared whether there were diferences in morphology among populations from diferent geographical regions.

METHODS

The CT data of 80 patients were imported into Mimics software for three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement. The differences in distal humeral morphological parameters between different genders and sides were compared, and the correlation between the parameters was explored. The distal humeral morphological parameters between Western and Chinese populations based on current and previous pooled results were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-one morphological parameters were measured and analyzed in this study. The average (and standard deviation) of capitellum depth, capitellum width, capitellum height, distal humerus width, epitrochlea width, and humeral metaphyseal width was 10.83 ± 1.18 mm, 17.60 ± 2.06 mm, 21.10 ± 2.03 mm, 44.38 ± 4.07 mm, 12.02 ± 1.90 mm and 58.95 ± 4.86 mm, these parameters were significantly higher (P < 0.001*) in males than females. The capitellum width (r = -0.300, P = 0.007*), anterior lateral trochlear depth (r =-0.227, P = 0.043*), medial crest coronal tangential angle (r = 0.307, P = 0.006*), olecranon fossa volume (r = -0.408, P < 0.001*), olecranon fossa surface area (r = -0.345, P = 0.002*) and coronoid fossa surface area (r = -0.279, P = 0.012*) were significantly correlated with the age of the subjects. In the comparison of people from different regions, the capitellum height, lateral trochlear high, trochlear groove high, trochlear depth and medial trochlear high of the Western population were 23.25 ± 2.56 m, 21.6 ± 2.20 mm, 17.8 ± 2.00 mm, 17.80 ± 2.00 mm, 29.9 ± 4.10 mm, are significantly higher than those in the Chinese population. while capitellum width (15.55 ± 2.68 mm) and capitellum depth (9.00 ± 1.00 mm) were slightly lower.

CONCLUSION

The findings provide a basis for the design of distal humeral orthopaedic implants, ensuring greater alignment with the anatomical structure of the distal humerus and improved surgical outcomes. Furthermore, the study provides a reference point for the diagnosis and classification of distal humeral diseases, as well as guidance for patient rehabilitation.