Suppr超能文献

非侵入性远程缺血预处理用于接受心脏导管插入术的心力衰竭患者:一项随机对照试验的网状荟萃分析

Non-invasive remote ischemic preconditioning for patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac catheterization: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Cao Li-Jun, Wang Wen-Juan, Zhou Qin-Xue

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine-Cardiovascular, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, No. 158 of Guangchang Hou Road, Wuxing District, Huzhou, 313000, China.

Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Zhejiang, 313000, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;19(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03082-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of six non-invasive remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) interventions during the nursing care of patients with heart failure (HF) prior to cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of nine Chinese and English online databases was conducted from the date of their inception to June 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating RIPC in patients with HF prior to cardiac catheterization. Two independent investigators screened the articles, extracted data, and assessed their quality. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using R software.

RESULTS

Four trials involving 511 patients with a low risk of bias were included in the analysis. Six non-invasive RIPC interventions were identified, all demonstrating effectiveness in reducing the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Among these, Intervention F (applying up to 50 mmHg above the resting systolic pressure for 5 min to the dominant leg or upper limb, repeated three times with an 18-minute interval) was deemed optimal, although the timing of the procedure was not specified. Intervention D (applying up to 200 mmHg pressure to the upper limb for 5 min, repeated four times with 5-minute intervals, within 45 min prior to cardiac catheterization, ) was considered suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

Although Intervention D was recommended as the preferred option, none of the four trials examined its impact on the cardiac function of patients with HF. Large-scale, multi-center RCTs are required, with outcome indicators including cardiac function and the occurrence of CI-AKI, to better understand the therapeutic effects of RIPC on HF and reduce the incidence of CI-AKI. This will provide a more robust foundation for clinical practice.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估六种非侵入性远程缺血预处理(RIPC)干预措施在心力衰竭(HF)患者心脏导管插入术前护理中的效果。

方法

从九个中英文在线数据库建立之日起至2023年6月进行全面检索,以识别在心脏导管插入术前对HF患者进行RIPC的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名独立研究人员筛选文章、提取数据并评估其质量。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,并使用R软件进行网络荟萃分析。

结果

分析纳入了四项涉及511例低偏倚风险患者的试验。确定了六种非侵入性RIPC干预措施,所有措施均显示在降低造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)发生率方面有效。其中,干预措施F(将收缩压比静息收缩压高50 mmHg施加于优势腿或上肢5分钟,间隔18分钟重复三次)被认为是最佳措施,尽管未指定该操作的时间。干预措施D(在心脏导管插入术前45分钟内,将200 mmHg压力施加于上肢5分钟,间隔5分钟重复四次)被认为是次优措施。

结论

尽管干预措施D被推荐为首选方案,但四项试验均未研究其对HF患者心脏功能的影响。需要进行大规模、多中心RCT,其结果指标包括心脏功能和CI-AKI的发生情况,以更好地了解RIPC对HF的治疗效果并降低CI-AKI的发生率。这将为临床实践提供更坚实的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a408/11443880/b8916d4634bf/13019_2024_3082_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验