Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;50(4):527-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 23.
Despite the increasing use of pre- and post-hydration protocols and low osmolar instead of high osmolar iodine containing contrast media, the incidence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is still significant. There is evidence that contrast media cause ischemia reperfusion injury of the renal medulla. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a non-invasive, safe, and low cost method to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury. The aim of this study is to investigate whether RIPC, as an adjunct to standard preventive measures, reduces contrast induced acute kidney injury in patients at risk of CIN.
The RIPCIN study is a multicenter, single blinded, randomized controlled trial in which 76 patients at risk of CIN received standard hydration combined with RIPC or hydration with sham preconditioning. RIPC was applied by four cycles of 5 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion of the forearm. The primary outcome measure was the change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48 to 72 hours after contrast administration.
With regard to the primary endpoint, no significant effect of RIPC was found. CIN occurred in four patients (2 sham and 2 RIPC). A pre-defined subgroup analysis of patients with a Mehran risk score ≥11, showed a significantly reduced change in serum creatinine from baseline to 48 to 72 hours in patients allocated to the RIPC group (Δ creatinine -3.3 ± 9.8 μmol/L) compared with the sham group (Δ creatinine +17.8 ± 20.1 μmol/L).
RIPC, as an adjunct to standard preventive measures, does not improve serum creatinine levels after contrast administration in patients at risk of CIN according to the Dutch guideline. However, the present data indicate that RIPC might have beneficial effects in patients at a high or very high risk of CIN (Mehran score ≥ 11). The RIPCIN study is registered at: http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN76496973.
尽管越来越多地使用预和后水化方案以及低渗而非高渗含碘造影剂,但对比剂诱导的肾病(CIN)的发生率仍然很高。有证据表明造影剂会引起肾髓质的缺血再灌注损伤。远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是一种非侵入性、安全且低成本的方法,可减少缺血再灌注损伤。本研究旨在探讨 RIPC 是否可以作为标准预防措施的辅助手段,降低 CIN 高危患者的对比剂诱导急性肾损伤。
RIPCIN 研究是一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验,共纳入 76 例 CIN 高危患者,他们接受标准水化联合 RIPC 或假预处理水化。RIPC 通过 5 分钟缺血和 5 分钟再灌注前臂四个循环来实施。主要观察终点是造影后 48 至 72 小时血清肌酐与基线相比的变化。
就主要终点而言,未发现 RIPC 的显著效果。有 4 名患者(2 名假处理和 2 名 RIPC)发生 CIN。对 Mehran 风险评分≥11 的患者进行的亚组分析显示,与假处理组(Δ肌酐+17.8±20.1μmol/L)相比,RIPC 组患者的血清肌酐从基线到 48 至 72 小时的变化显著降低(Δ肌酐-3.3±9.8μmol/L)。
根据荷兰指南,RIPC 作为标准预防措施的辅助手段,不能改善 CIN 高危患者造影后血清肌酐水平。然而,目前的数据表明,RIPC 可能对 CIN 高危或极高危患者(Mehran 评分≥11)有益。RIPCIN 研究在:http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN76496973 注册。