• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传导系统起搏的心脏再同步化

Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing.

作者信息

Ezzeddine Fatima M, Leon Isaac G, Cha Yong-Mei

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, US.

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, US.

出版信息

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Aug 11;12:e22. doi: 10.15420/aer.2023.03. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.15420/aer.2023.03
PMID:37654672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10466271/
Abstract

To date, biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the standard pacing modality for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. However, it is non-physiological, with the activation spreading between the left ventricular epicardium and right ventricular endocardium. Up to one-third of patients with heart failure who are eligible for cardiac resynchronisation therapy do not derive benefit from BiVP. Conduction system pacing (CSP), which includes His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as an alternative to BiVP for cardiac resynchronisation. There is mounting evidence supporting the benefits of CSP in achieving synchronous ventricular activation and repolarisation. The aim of this review is to summarise the current options and outcomes of CSP when used for cardiac resynchronisation in patients with heart failure.

摘要

迄今为止,双心室起搏(BiVP)一直是心脏再同步治疗的标准起搏方式。然而,它不符合生理情况,激动在左心室心外膜和右心室心内膜之间传播。符合心脏再同步治疗条件的心力衰竭患者中,多达三分之一无法从双心室起搏中获益。传导系统起搏(CSP),包括希氏束起搏和左束支区域起搏,已成为双心室起搏用于心脏再同步治疗的替代方法。越来越多的证据支持传导系统起搏在实现心室同步激动和复极方面的益处。本综述的目的是总结传导系统起搏用于心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗时的当前选择和结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/806077d18779/aer-12-e22-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/de010ccf86d5/aer-12-e22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/60123f5f843b/aer-12-e22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/806077d18779/aer-12-e22-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/de010ccf86d5/aer-12-e22-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/60123f5f843b/aer-12-e22-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceba/10466271/806077d18779/aer-12-e22-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac Resynchronisation with Conduction System Pacing.传导系统起搏的心脏再同步化
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Aug 11;12:e22. doi: 10.15420/aer.2023.03. eCollection 2023.
2
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial.心力衰竭伴宽 QRS 波患者的心脏传导系统起搏与双心室起搏比较:LEVEL-AT 试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Nov;8(11):1431-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation.心脏再同步化治疗的传导系统起搏
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Apr;10(1):51-58. doi: 10.15420/aer.2020.45.
4
Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗的传导系统起搏
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Oct 31;10(11):448. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110448.
5
Impact of physiologic pacing versus right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: A systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.左心室射血分数大于 35%的患者中生理性起搏与右心室起搏的影响:2018 年 ACC/AHA/HRS 心动过缓和心脏传导阻滞患者评估和管理指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):e280-e298. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.035. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction.中等射血分数患者中传导系统起搏与双心室起搏的临床结局比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;68(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01882-z. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
7
The Emerging Role of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.左束支区域起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的新兴作用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Dec 1;12:e29. doi: 10.15420/aer.2023.15. eCollection 2023.
8
Permanent His bundle pacing to replace biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.永久希氏束起搏替代双心室起搏用于心脏再同步治疗。
Med Hypotheses. 2017 Nov;109:77-79. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.09.026. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Biventricular or Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Based on a Hybrid Approach.双心室或传导系统起搏用于心脏再同步治疗:基于混合方法的心脏再同步策略
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Apr 14;10(4):169. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10040169.
10
Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.心力衰竭合并完全性左束支传导阻滞患者中左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏的长期预后
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jul;37(7):1162-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-02016-5. Epub 2022 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Left bundle branch area pacing in a case of Steinert's disease.斯坦纳特病病例中的左束支区域起搏
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025 Jan 7;11(4):318-321. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.01.001. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Conduction System Pacing for CRT: A Physiological Alternative.心脏再同步治疗的传导系统起搏:一种生理性替代方案。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2025 Feb 18;14:e04. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.10. eCollection 2025.
3
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing.传导系统起搏的当前进展、挑战及未来展望

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure: A multicenter experience.心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗中传导系统起搏的结果:一项多中心经验。
Heart Rhythm. 2023 Jun;20(6):863-871. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial.心力衰竭伴宽 QRS 波患者的心脏传导系统起搏与双心室起搏比较:LEVEL-AT 试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Nov;8(11):1431-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Conduction system pacing in everyday clinical practice: EHRA physician survey.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 16;25(12):438. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512438. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Clinical Decision Making and Technical Approaches in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Procedures: A Step by Step Critical Appraisal of Literature.植入式心脏复律除颤器手术中的临床决策与技术方法:文献的逐步批判性评估
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Nov 18;25(11):403. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2511403. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者房室结消融联合永久性希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏的综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 5;25(9):312. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509312. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
British Heart Rhythm Society Standards for Implantation and Follow-up of Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices in Adults: January 2024 Update.英国心脏节律协会成人心脏节律管理设备植入与随访标准:2024年1月更新
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Jul 1;13:e10. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.01. eCollection 2024.
日常临床实践中的传导系统起搏:EHRA 医师调查。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):682-687. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac201.
4
Comparison between conduction system pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block patients.右束支传导阻滞患者中传导系统起搏与心脏再同步治疗的比较。
Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 21;13:1011566. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1011566. eCollection 2022.
5
Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.随机试验:左束支起搏与双心室起搏治疗心脏再同步治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
6
Conduction system pacing versus conventional pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: Nonrandomized, on-treatment comparison.房室结消融患者的传导系统起搏与传统起搏:非随机、治疗中比较。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 4;3(4):368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.04.005. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group.心力衰竭合并右束支传导阻滞患者的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 14;3(4):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS study.左束支区域起搏的临床结局:多中心欧洲 MELOS 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):4161-4173. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac445.
9
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disease: A prospective multicenter study.左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导疾病患者:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Sep;19(9):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.与双心室起搏相比,在需要心脏再同步治疗的患者中,传导系统起搏的临床结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 Apr 29.