Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Oct;40(7):e3845. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3845.
To assess whether impaired vestibular perception of self-motion is a risk factor for unsteadiness and falls in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
113 participants (65-75 years old) with T2D underwent tests of roll and pitch discrimination, postural stability (Berg Balance Scale, Modified Romberg Test, and quantitative posturography), clinical examination and blood chemistry analyses. Falls 1-year after enrolment were self-reported. We performed cluster analysis based on the values of the vestibular motion thresholds, and logistic stepwise regression to compare the clinical-biochemical parameters between clusters.
We identified two clusters (VC1 n = 65 and VC2 n = 48 participants). VC2 had significantly (p < 0.001) higher (poorer) thresholds than VC1: mean pitch threshold 1.62°/s (95% CI 1.48-1.78) in VC2 and 0.91°/s (95% CI 0.84-0.98) in VC1, mean roll threshold 1.34°/s (95% CI 1.21-1.48) in VC2 and 0.69°/s (95% CI 0.64-0.74) in VC1. Diabetes duration was significantly (p = 0.024) longer in VC2 (11.96 years, 95% CI 9.23-14.68) than in VC1 (8.37 years, 95% CI 6.85-9.88). Glycaemic control was significantly (p = 0.014) poorer in VC2 (mean HbA1c 6.74%, 95% CI 6.47-7.06) than in VC1 (mean HbA1c 6.34%, 95% CI 6.16-6.53). VC2 had a significantly higher incidence of postural instability than VC1, with a higher risk of failing the Modified Romberg Test C4 (RR = 1.57, χ = 5.33, p = 0.021), reporting falls during follow-up (RR = 11.48, χ = 9.40, p = 0.002), and greater postural sway in the medio-lateral direction (p < 0.025).
Assessing vestibular motion thresholds identifies individuals with T2D at risk of postural instability due to altered motion perception and guides vestibular rehabilitation.
评估 2 型糖尿病(T2D)老年患者前庭感知自身运动障碍是否是不稳定和跌倒的危险因素。
113 名参与者(65-75 岁)患有 T2D,接受了滚转和俯仰辨别、姿势稳定性(Berg 平衡量表、改良 Romberg 测试和定量姿势描记术)、临床检查和血液化学分析的测试。在入组后 1 年,自我报告跌倒情况。我们根据前庭运动阈值的值进行聚类分析,并进行逻辑逐步回归,以比较两组之间的临床生化参数。
我们确定了两个聚类(VC1 n=65 和 VC2 n=48 名参与者)。VC2 的阈值显著(p<0.001)更高(更差):VC2 的平均俯仰阈值为 1.62°/s(95%CI 1.48-1.78),而 VC1 的平均俯仰阈值为 0.91°/s(95%CI 0.84-0.98);VC2 的平均滚转阈值为 1.34°/s(95%CI 1.21-1.48),而 VC1 的平均滚转阈值为 0.69°/s(95%CI 0.64-0.74)。与 VC1(95%CI 6.85-9.88)相比,VC2 的糖尿病病程显著(p=0.024)更长(11.96 年)。与 VC1(95%CI 6.47-7.06)相比,VC2 的血糖控制显著(p=0.014)更差(平均 HbA1c 为 6.74%)。与 VC1 相比,VC2 的姿势不稳定发生率显著更高(改良 Romberg 测试 C4 失败的风险更高,RR=1.57,χ=5.33,p=0.021),报告在随访期间跌倒(RR=11.48,χ=9.40,p=0.002),且在中-侧方向的姿势摆动更大(p<0.025)。
评估前庭运动阈值可以识别出由于运动感知改变而有姿势不稳定风险的 T2D 患者,并指导前庭康复。