Fiori James Giulian, Kim Steven, Wallace Marina Helen, Rankin Samantha, Ayonrinde Oyekoya Taiwo
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 11 Robin Warren Drive, Murdoch, Perth, WA, WA 6150, Australia.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Oct 2;39(1):155. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04722-8.
There are conflicting reports regarding the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) subsequent to colonoscopy with polypectomy or biopsy performed concurrently with diagnostic biopsies for CRC. We aimed to establish the 5-year risk of CRC in patients who had synchronous polypectomy or biopsies during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.
This is a single-centre retrospective case-control study of adults who underwent surgical resection for CRC over a 2-year period (January 2016 to December 2017). Colonoscopy details of interest were the location of the CRC, polypectomy and non-CRC biopsy sites. In patients with CRC at index colonoscopy, we sought associations between the occurrence of metachronous CRC and the sites from which endoscopic specimens had been obtained.
Our study population comprised 225 patients with a median (IQR) age of 71 (60-77) years. Polypectomy or biopsy at a non-CRC site had been performed during the index colonoscopy in 108 patients (48%), including 83 (37%) polypectomies outside the surgical resection field. There were 8 (3.6%) metachronous CRCs: 1 (0.4%) at the site of endoscopic mucosal resection for a 15-mm sessile serrated lesion, 3 (1.3%) anastomotic site CRCs and 4 (1.8%) at other sites within the colon. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of metachronous CRC in patients who underwent polypectomy/biopsy at the index colonoscopy compared with those who did not (1.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.283).
There was no significant increased risk of metachronous CRC subsequent to synchronous polypectomy or biopsy during the colonoscopy at which CRC was diagnosed.
关于在结肠镜检查时进行息肉切除术或活检(与结直肠癌诊断性活检同时进行)后发生异时性结直肠癌(CRC)的风险,存在相互矛盾的报道。我们旨在确定在诊断CRC的结肠镜检查期间同时进行同步息肉切除术或活检的患者发生CRC的5年风险。
这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究,研究对象为在2年期间(2016年1月至2017年12月)接受CRC手术切除的成年人。感兴趣的结肠镜检查细节包括CRC的位置、息肉切除术和非CRC活检部位。在初次结肠镜检查时患有CRC的患者中,我们寻找异时性CRC的发生与获取内镜标本的部位之间的关联。
我们的研究人群包括225例患者,中位(IQR)年龄为71(60 - 77)岁。108例患者(48%)在初次结肠镜检查期间在非CRC部位进行了息肉切除术或活检,其中83例(37%)在手术切除范围外进行了息肉切除术。有8例(3.6%)异时性CRC:1例(0.4%)发生在对15毫米无蒂锯齿状病变进行内镜黏膜切除的部位,3例(1.3%)发生在吻合口部位的CRC,4例(1.8%)发生在结肠内的其他部位。在初次结肠镜检查时进行息肉切除术/活检的患者与未进行的患者中,异时性CRC的患病率无显著差异(1.9%对5.1%,p = 0.283)。
在诊断CRC的结肠镜检查期间进行同步息肉切除术或活检后,异时性CRC的风险没有显著增加。