• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极右翼势力将公共卫生问题工具化用于宣传

The Instrumentalization of Public Health Issues for Propaganda by the Far-Right.

作者信息

Cordeiro-Rodrigues L, Cole D Landon, Duan D

机构信息

Philosophy, Yuelu Academy, Hunan University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.

ASEN, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):321-326. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10388-2. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-024-10388-2
PMID:39356442
Abstract

Political opportunism of the far-right threatens the efficacy of public health policies and political stability in general. In this commentary, we outline some of the ways that the European far-right has misused public health concerns as propaganda tools. This is a significant threat to the goals of making health and science more inclusive, and we recommend some policies for mitigating the racist effect of the far-right. Notably, we recommend (a) transparency in health policies and robust implementation of the rule of law, (b) the use of operative public values and human rights in health policy making, and (c) investment in decolonizing mindsets which may be corrosive of health policies.

摘要

极右翼的政治机会主义威胁着公共卫生政策的效力以及总体政治稳定。在本评论中,我们概述了欧洲极右翼将公共卫生问题用作宣传工具的一些方式。这对使健康和科学更具包容性的目标构成了重大威胁,我们建议采取一些政策来减轻极右翼的种族主义影响。值得注意的是,我们建议:(a)卫生政策透明化并大力实施法治;(b)在卫生政策制定中运用有效的公共价值观和人权;(c)投资于消除可能侵蚀卫生政策的思维定式。

相似文献

1
The Instrumentalization of Public Health Issues for Propaganda by the Far-Right.极右翼势力将公共卫生问题工具化用于宣传
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):321-326. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10388-2. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Administrative and research policies required to bring cellular therapies from the research laboratory to the patient's bedside.将细胞疗法从研究实验室应用于患者床边所需的管理和研究政策。
Transfusion. 2005 Oct;45(4 Suppl):144S-58S. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00616.x.
3
Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review.政治和制度因素对公共卫生政策中证据使用的影响。系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077404. eCollection 2013.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.健康公平倡导:一项综合综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12112.
6
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Barriers and Opportunities for WHO "Best Buys" Non-communicable Disease Policy Adoption and Implementation From a Political Economy Perspective: A Complexity Systematic Review.从政治经济学角度看世界卫生组织“最佳购买”非传染性疾病政策采用和实施的障碍和机遇:一项复杂性系统评价。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7989. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7989. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
8
Why Was the Policy Idea on the Health Benefits Package Advisory Panel Gazetted in Kenya? A Retrospective Policy Analysis.为何肯尼亚要将健康福利套餐顾问小组政策提案刊登宪报?一项回溯性政策分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7608. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.7608. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Raising complex public health challenges on local government agendas: a Norwegian case study.将复杂的公共卫生挑战提上地方政府议程:一项挪威的案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural competence must not leave anyone behind.文化能力绝不能让任何人掉队。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Dec;7(12):2040-2041. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01739-x.
2
Operative public values as a tool for healthcare decisions: the social value and clinical criteria of triage.作为医疗决策工具的手术公共价值:分诊的社会价值和临床标准。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2022 Sep 28;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-022-00124-2.
3
Cultural diversity is crucial for African neuroethics.文化多样性对非洲神经伦理学至关重要。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Sep;6(9):1185-1187. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01436-1.