Vigsnes Kristine Løkås, Kiland Charlotte, Rutter Harry, Abildsnes Eirik
Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sport Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Department of Research and Innovation, Kristiansand Municipality, Kristiansand, Norway.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3.
Public health challenges, ranging from noncommunicable disease prevention to pandemic preparedness, involve both policymaking and the handling of complexity at local, national or global level. The complexity of public health challenges arises from uncertain knowledge, hidden mechanisms, differing conceptual models and multiple stakeholders, making it difficult to identify and agree on problem definitions and potential solutions. This case study aims to provide insights into how complex public health challenges are addressed within local government agendas. We use theories of policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting to explore the processes behind the agenda setting of a public health programme for work inclusion.
We conducted an in-depth case study in a local government context. Data from interviews with key informants and political documents were triangulated and analysed using deductive thematic content analysis, framed within Kingdon's agenda-setting theory and theories of policy entrepreneurs.
We identified problem framing, the involvement of multiple actors, and turbulent surroundings as influential factors for agenda setting of complex public health challenges in local government. We further identified the significance of the level of influence of policy entrepreneurs' positions, their coalitions and maintaining agenda control as core mechanisms for enabling agenda setting. We found that strategic manoeuvres of policy entrepreneurs were crucial to handle and manoeuvre complexity within the multiple streams described by Kingdon.
This article contributes knowledge of how complex public health problems receive attention and how these issues are shaped and defined, placed on governmental agendas, and paired with solutions. The article contributes important insights for understanding policy responses to complex public health problems and how policy entrepreneurs strategically manoeuvre within the streams of policy development to create windows of opportunity and maintain agenda control. This is important knowledge to support agenda setting for public health challenges and to realize policies to improve public health.
从非传染性疾病预防到大流行防范,公共卫生挑战涉及地方、国家或全球层面的政策制定和复杂性处理。公共卫生挑战的复杂性源于知识的不确定性、隐藏机制、不同的概念模型和多个利益相关者,这使得难以确定并就问题定义和潜在解决方案达成共识。本案例研究旨在深入了解地方政府议程中如何应对复杂的公共卫生挑战。我们运用政策企业家和议程设置理论,探讨一项促进工作融入的公共卫生计划议程设置背后的过程。
我们在地方政府背景下进行了深入的案例研究。通过对关键信息提供者的访谈数据和政治文件进行三角测量,并运用演绎主题内容分析法进行分析,该分析以金登的议程设置理论和政策企业家理论为框架。
我们确定了问题框架、多个行为体的参与以及动荡的环境是地方政府中复杂公共卫生挑战议程设置的影响因素。我们进一步确定了政策企业家职位的影响力水平、他们的联盟以及维持议程控制的重要性,这些是促成议程设置的核心机制。我们发现政策企业家的战略行动对于在金登所描述的多个流中处理和应对复杂性至关重要。
本文提供了关于复杂公共卫生问题如何受到关注、这些问题如何形成和定义、如何被列入政府议程以及如何与解决方案配对的知识。本文为理解对复杂公共卫生问题的政策回应以及政策企业家如何在政策发展流中进行战略行动以创造机会之窗并维持议程控制提供了重要见解。这是支持公共卫生挑战议程设置并实现改善公共卫生政策的重要知识。