Olsen I, Brondz I
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Oct;22(4):629-36. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.4.629-636.1985.
Bacteriolysis in Tris-maleate buffer (0.005 M, pH 7.2) supplemented with EDTA (0.01 M) and hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL, 1.0 microgram/ml) was set up to assist differentiation between the taxonomically closely related Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Haemophilus aphrophilus. A. actinomycetemcomitans was more sensitive to lysis in this system than H. aphrophilus. The standard method for bacteriolysis separated the 10 tested strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans into two groups (I and II) based on their lysis patterns, whereas the 7 strains of H. aphrophilus examined were homogeneous. In group I of A. actinomycetemcomitans, EDTA displayed a considerable lytic effect, which was not increased by supplementation with HEWL. In group II, the lytic effect of EDTA was much less, but HEWL had a considerable supplementary lytic effect. When the turbidity of A. actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 29522) or H. aphrophilus (ATCC 33389) suspended in Tris buffer was monitored at close pH intervals (0.2) from pH 5.2 to 9.2, maximal lysis of ATCC 29522 occurred with EDTA at pH 8.0 and with EDTA-HEWL at pH 7.6, while ATCC 33389 lysed with EDTA at pH 9.0 and with EDTA-HEWL at pH 9.2. When other members of the family Pasteurellaceae (Haemophilus influenzae type b, Haemophilus paraphrophilus, Pasteurella multocida, Pasteurella haemolytica, and Pasteurella ureae) were included for comparison, the group I strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans were the most rapidly lysed by EDTA. H. paraphrophilus was the least sensitive of the gram-negative strains tested, but not as resistant as Micrococcus luteus (control). M. luteus was the organism most sensitive to lysozyme, followed by P. ureae and the group II strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, while the group I strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans, H. paraphrophilus, and P. haemolytica were the least sensitive organisms.
在含有乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA,0.01M)和鸡蛋清溶菌酶(HEWL,1.0微克/毫升)的马来酸三羟甲基氨基甲烷缓冲液(0.005M,pH7.2)中进行细菌溶解实验,以辅助区分分类学上密切相关的伴放线放线杆菌和嗜沫嗜血杆菌。在该系统中,伴放线放线杆菌比嗜沫嗜血杆菌对溶解更敏感。细菌溶解的标准方法根据其溶解模式将10株受试的伴放线放线杆菌菌株分为两组(I组和II组),而检测的7株嗜沫嗜血杆菌菌株是同质的。在伴放线放线杆菌的I组中,EDTA显示出相当大的溶解作用,添加HEWL后并未增强。在II组中,EDTA的溶解作用要小得多,但HEWL具有相当大的辅助溶解作用。当在pH5.2至9.2的紧密pH间隔(0.2)下监测悬浮在Tris缓冲液中的伴放线放线杆菌(ATCC 29522)或嗜沫嗜血杆菌(ATCC 33389)的浊度时,ATCC 29522在pH8.0时用EDTA达到最大溶解,在pH7.6时用EDTA-HEWL达到最大溶解,而ATCC 33389在pH9.0时用EDTA溶解,在pH9.2时用EDTA-HEWL溶解。当纳入巴斯德菌科的其他成员(b型流感嗜血杆菌、副嗜沫嗜血杆菌、多杀巴斯德菌、溶血巴斯德菌和脲巴斯德菌)进行比较时,伴放线放线杆菌的I组菌株被EDTA溶解得最快。副嗜沫嗜血杆菌是受试革兰氏阴性菌株中最不敏感的,但不像藤黄微球菌(对照)那样具有抗性。藤黄微球菌是对溶菌酶最敏感的生物体,其次是脲巴斯德菌和伴放线放线杆菌的II组菌株,而伴放线放线杆菌的I组菌株、副嗜沫嗜血杆菌和溶血巴斯德菌是最不敏感的生物体。