McKinzey R K, Curley J F, Fish J M
J Clin Psychol. 1985 Nov;41(6):812-20. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198511)41:6<812::aid-jclp2270410615>3.0.co;2-v.
This study correlated the Canter's Background Interference Procedure (BIP) scores of 141 adult epileptics with the five variables of age at onset of symptoms, etiology, type of symptoms, severity of generalized background dysrhythmia, and locus of lesion. These variables did not correlate significantly with the BIP scores, contrary to expectations. The BIP's nearly 50% false negative rate was much higher than that of the Trail Making Test, using either Reitan's or Russell's cutting scores for Trails A (33% and 21%, respectively) or Trails B (35% and 28.5%, respectively). The BIP often does not agree with abnormal neurological diagnoses, but often does agree with psychiatric diagnoses of Organic Brain Syndrome (OBS). The authors argue that this is due to the BIP's normative history and to its sensitivity to organic concreteness. The authors suggest that future BIP validity studies include a behavioral measure of OBS as criterion.
本研究将141名成年癫痫患者的坎特背景干扰程序（BIP）得分与症状发作年龄、病因、症状类型、广泛性背景节律异常的严重程度以及病变部位这五个变量进行了关联分析。与预期相反，这些变量与BIP得分并无显著相关性。BIP近50%的假阴性率远高于连线测验，无论是使用雷坦或拉塞尔针对A项连线测验（分别为33%和21%）或B项连线测验（分别为35%和28.5%）所设定的划界分数。BIP常常与异常的神经学诊断不一致，但却常常与器质性脑综合征（OBS）的精神病学诊断一致。作者认为，这是由于BIP的常模历史及其对器质性具体情况的敏感性所致。作者建议，未来关于BIP效度的研究应纳入一项以OBS行为测量作为标准的研究。
