Sultana Adiba, Migliori Giovanni Battista, D'Ambrosio Lia, García-García José-María, Silva Denise Rossato, Rendon Luis Adrian, Codecasa Luigi R, Blanc Francois-Xavier, Tiberi Simon, Ong Catherine W M, Heffernan Courtney, Sotgiu Giovanni, Centis Rosella, Dobler Claudia Caroline
. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Sep 27;50(4):e20240082. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240082. eCollection 2024.
Many biologic agents cause some degree of immunosuppression, which can increase the risk of reactivation of tuberculosis infection (TBI). This risk is variable between individual biologics. We aimed to assess current (and recommended) clinical practice of TBI screening and treatment among patients initiating treatment with biologic agents.
An online questionnaire was distributed via email to members of the Global Tuberculosis Network and associated professional organisations to seek insights into the screening for and treatment of TBI in patients treated with biologics.
A total of 163 respondents in 27 countries answered at least one question. For all biologics described in the questionnaire, respondents advised increasing screening relative to current practice. Observed and supported TBI screening rates in patients treated with TNF-a inhibitors were high, especially for older TNF-a inhibitors. Most participants supported TBI screening in patients treated with B- or T-cell inhibitors but not in those treated with interleukin inhibitors. Guideline awareness was higher for TNF-a inhibitors than for other biologic classes (79% vs. 34%).
Although respondents stated that TBI screening rates are lower than what they consider ideal, there was a tendency to recommend TBI screening in patients treated with biologics not known to be associated with an increased risk of TBI. As a result, there is a potential risk of over-screening and over-treatment of TBI, potentially causing harm, in patients treated with biologics other than TNF-a inhibitors. There is a need to research the risk of TBI associated with biologics and for guidelines to address the spectrum of TBI risk across all types of biologics.
许多生物制剂会导致一定程度的免疫抑制,这可能会增加结核感染(TBI)再激活的风险。这种风险在不同的生物制剂之间存在差异。我们旨在评估开始使用生物制剂治疗的患者中TBI筛查和治疗的当前(及推荐)临床实践。
通过电子邮件向全球结核病网络成员和相关专业组织分发了一份在线问卷,以了解生物制剂治疗患者中TBI的筛查和治疗情况。
来自27个国家的163名受访者至少回答了一个问题。对于问卷中描述的所有生物制剂,受访者建议相对于当前实践增加筛查。使用肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂治疗的患者中观察到的和支持的TBI筛查率很高,尤其是对于较老的TNF-α抑制剂。大多数参与者支持对使用B细胞或T细胞抑制剂治疗的患者进行TBI筛查,但不支持对使用白细胞介素抑制剂治疗的患者进行筛查。TNF-α抑制剂的指南知晓率高于其他生物制剂类别(79%对34%)。
尽管受访者表示TBI筛查率低于他们认为理想的水平,但对于已知与TBI风险增加无关的生物制剂治疗的患者,仍有推荐进行TBI筛查的趋势。因此,在使用除TNF-α抑制剂以外的生物制剂治疗的患者中,存在TBI过度筛查和过度治疗的潜在风险,可能会造成伤害。有必要研究与生物制剂相关的TBI风险,并制定指南以应对所有类型生物制剂的TBI风险范围。