Suppr超能文献

(DZK、DGRh、DDG)关于新型非 TNF-α 生物制剂治疗结核病风险的联合声明。

Joint Statement (DZK, DGRh, DDG) on the Tuberculosis Risk with Treatment Using Novel Non-TNF-Alpha Biologicals.

机构信息

Institute for Epidemiology, University Medical Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. Member of the German Center for Lung Research (ARCN).

LungClinic Grosshansdorf, Germany. Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL).

出版信息

Pneumologie. 2021 Apr;75(4):293-303. doi: 10.1055/a-1294-1580. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation is adequately documented in relation to TNF-alpha inhibitors (TNFi), the question of what the tuberculosis risk is for newer, non-TNF biologics (non-TNFi) has not been thoroughly addressed.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized phase 2 and phase 3 studies, and long-term extensions of same, published through March 2019. Of interest was information pertaining to screening and treating of latent tuberculosis (LTBI) in association with the use of 12 particular non-TNFi. Only rituximab was excluded. We searched MEDLINE and the ClinicalTrial.gov database for any and all candidate studies meeting these criteria.

RESULTS

677 citations were retrieved; 127 studies comprising a total of 34,293 patients who received non-TNFi were eligible for evaluation. Only 80 out of the 127 studies, or 63 %, captured active TB (or at least opportunistic diseases) as potential outcomes and 25 TB cases were reported. More than two thirds of publications (86/127, 68 %) mentioned LTBI screening prior to inclusion of study participants in the respective trial, whereas in only 4 studies LTBI screening was explicitly considered redundant. In 21 studies, patients with LTBI were generally excluded from the trials and in 42 out of the 127 trials, or 33 %, latently infected patients were reported to receive preventive therapy (PT) at least 3 weeks prior to non-TNFi treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of information in many non-TNFi studies on the number of patients with LTBI who were either excluded prior to participating or had been offered PT hampers assessment of the actual TB risk when applying the novel biologics. Therefore, in case of insufficient information about drugs or drug classes, the existing recommendations of the German Central Committee against Tuberculosis should be applied in the same way as is done prior to administering TNFi. Well designed, long-term "real world" register studies on TB progression risk in relation to individual substances for IGRA-positive cases without prior or concomitant PT may help to reduce selection bias and to achieve valid conclusions in the future.

摘要

背景

虽然 TNF-α 抑制剂(TNFi)与结核再激活风险相关的证据充分,但新型非 TNF 生物制剂(非 TNFi)的结核风险问题尚未得到彻底解决。

方法

我们对截至 2019 年 3 月发表的随机 2 期和 3 期研究及相同研究的长期扩展进行了系统评价。我们关注的是与使用 12 种特定非 TNFi 相关的潜伏性结核(LTBI)筛查和治疗信息。仅排除利妥昔单抗。我们在 MEDLINE 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库中搜索了符合这些标准的任何候选研究。

结果

共检索到 677 条引文;127 项研究共纳入 34293 例接受非 TNFi 治疗的患者,符合评估条件。仅有 80 项研究(127 项研究中的 80 项,63%)报告了活动性结核病(或至少是机会性疾病)作为潜在结局,共报告了 25 例结核病病例。超过三分之二的出版物(127 项研究中的 86 项,68%)提到在纳入研究参与者之前进行 LTBI 筛查,而仅有 4 项研究明确认为筛查是多余的。在 21 项研究中,一般将 LTBI 患者排除在试验之外,在 127 项研究中的 42 项(33%)研究中,报告了潜伏感染的患者在接受非 TNFi 治疗前至少 3 周接受预防性治疗(PT)。

结论

许多非 TNFi 研究缺乏关于参与研究前被排除或接受过 PT 的 LTBI 患者数量的信息,这阻碍了在应用新型生物制剂时评估实际结核病风险。因此,在药物或药物类别信息不足的情况下,应按照德国中央结核病防治委员会的现有建议,在使用 TNFi 之前同样适用。针对 IGRA 阳性病例,在没有预先或同时进行 PT 的情况下,针对个体药物进行 LTBI、结核病进展风险的长期、真实世界登记研究,可能有助于减少选择偏倚,并在未来得出有效的结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验