Erickson Taylor S, Frederick Robert, Pletcher Steven D, Dowden Aileen, Dunleavy Dana, Dobratz Eric J
is a Resident Physician, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
is a Resident Physician, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Macon & Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):357-361. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00894.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Since the shift to virtual residency interviews, applicants and programs have reported difficulty distinguishing themselves in a virtual format, reduced exposure to medical campuses, and limited opportunity to establish personal connections. The 2023-2024 application cycle was the first time virtual and in-person interview formats were available in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS). Programs offered one or both formats, and in some cases, applicants were given the choice between the 2. To assess the perceptions of OHNS applicants regarding virtual versus in-person interviews during the 2023-2024 application cycle. A 20-question survey was distributed via email through the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to OHNS applicants after Match Day during the 2023-2024 application cycle. The survey consisted of multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions to explore applicant preferences surrounding interview format. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical significance tests (Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests) to compare responses across different demographic groups. The survey achieved a 42% response rate (216 of 511). Of 199 respondents, 144 (72%) preferred in-person interviews. Subgroup comparisons showed no significant differences between gender. While applicants who identify as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) reported a strong preference for in-person interviews 24 of 35 (69%), their rate of preferring virtual interviews was higher than that of applicants who did not identify as URiM (χ=15.5, df=2, =.001). Of 199 respondents, 152 (76%) preferred allowing individual programs to choose their interview format. Overall, OHNS applicants show greater satisfaction with, and preference for, in-person interviews.
自从转向虚拟住院医师面试以来,申请人和项目都表示,在虚拟形式下很难脱颖而出,对医学院校的接触减少,建立个人联系的机会有限。2023 - 2024年申请周期是耳鼻喉 - 头颈外科(OHNS)首次同时提供虚拟和面对面面试形式。各项目提供了其中一种或两种形式,在某些情况下,申请人可以在这两种形式之间进行选择。为了评估2023 - 2024年申请周期中OHNS申请人对虚拟面试与面对面面试的看法。在2023 - 2024年申请周期的配对日之后,通过美国医学院协会(AAMC)通过电子邮件向OHNS申请人发放了一份包含20个问题的调查问卷。该调查包括多项选择题、李克特量表题和开放式问题,以探索申请人对面试形式的偏好。使用描述性统计和统计显著性检验(皮尔逊卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验)对数据进行分析,以比较不同人口群体的回答。该调查的回复率为42%(511人中216人回复)。在199名受访者中,144人(72%)更喜欢面对面面试。亚组比较显示性别之间没有显著差异。虽然自认为在医学领域代表性不足(URiM)的申请人中有24人(69%)强烈倾向于面对面面试,但他们更喜欢虚拟面试的比例高于未自认为是URiM的申请人(χ = 15.5,自由度 = 2,P = 0.001)。在199名受访者中,152人(76%)更喜欢允许各个项目自行选择面试形式。总体而言,OHNS申请人对面对面面试表现出更高的满意度和偏好。