Drogt Jojanneke, Milota Megan, van den Brink Anne, Jongsma Karin
University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 2;7(1):271. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01255-w.
Claims of AI outperforming medical practitioners are under scrutiny, as the evidence supporting many of these claims is not convincing or transparently reported. These claims often lack specificity, contextualization, and empirical grounding. In this comment, we offer constructive ethical guidance that can benefit authors, journal editors, and peer reviewers when reporting and evaluating findings in studies comparing AI to physician performance. The guidance provided here forms an essential addition to current reporting guidelines for healthcare studies using machine learning.
人工智能表现优于医学从业者的说法正在接受审查，因为支持其中许多说法的证据并不令人信服，也没有得到透明的报告。这些说法往往缺乏具体性、背景信息和实证依据。在这篇评论中，我们提供了建设性的伦理指导，在报告和评估比较人工智能与医生表现的研究结果时，这对作者、期刊编辑和同行评审人员都有益处。这里提供的指导是对当前使用机器学习的医疗保健研究报告指南的重要补充。
