• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中同期治疗大型食管裂孔疝:技术要点与结果

Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical considerations and outcome.

作者信息

Kollmann Lars, Thurner Annette, Miras Alexander Dimitri, Seyfried Florian

机构信息

Head of Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract and Metabolic Surgery, Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine (ZOM), University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2024 Dec;76(8):2973-2976. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02017-9. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-02017-9
PMID:39358588
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11628427/
Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the preferred surgical option for patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity grade ≥ II (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m). Data on simultaneous treatment of larger hiatal hernias during RYGB are scarce. From 2012 until 2022, data from all consecutive patients undergoing gastric bypass procedures were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing RYGB alone (RYGBa) versus RYGB with simultaneous treatment of a large hiatal hernia (RYGB-HH) were compared. Out of 573 patients who received RYGB, we identified 12 simultaneously treated for large hiatal hernia. The characteristics of RYGB-HH versus RYGBa patients were higher age (55 vs. 44 years; p = 0.004) and lower BMI (39.2 vs. 46.9 kg/m; p = 0.001). Duration of surgery in the RYGB-HH group was longer (144 min vs. 98 min; p < 0.001), while complications > Clavien-Dindo II were similar compared to the RYGBa group (8.3 vs. 9.4%, p = 0.56). Length of stay did not differ among the groups (4 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.051). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no clinical recurrence of hiatal hernia in the RYGB-HH group. Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery prolongs operation time but seems feasible and safe in the hands of experienced surgeons.

摘要

Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)是确诊为胃食管反流病且肥胖程度≥II级(BMI≥35kg/m²)患者的首选手术方式。关于RYGB术中同时治疗较大食管裂孔疝的数据较少。2012年至2022年,收集了所有接受胃旁路手术的连续患者的数据并进行回顾性分析。比较了单纯接受RYGB(RYGBa)与同时治疗大食管裂孔疝的RYGB(RYGB-HH)患者的特征和手术结果。在接受RYGB的573例患者中,我们确定了12例同时接受大食管裂孔疝治疗的患者。RYGB-HH组与RYGBa组患者的特征比较显示,前者年龄更大(55岁对44岁;p=0.004),BMI更低(39.2kg/m²对46.9kg/m²;p=0.001)。RYGB-HH组的手术时间更长(144分钟对98分钟;p<0.001),而与RYGBa组相比,Clavien-Dindo II级以上并发症相似(8.3%对9.4%,p=0.56)。各组的住院时间无差异(4天对5.5天,p=0.051)。在中位随访12个月时,RYGB-HH组食管裂孔疝无临床复发。Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中同时治疗大食管裂孔疝会延长手术时间,但在经验丰富的外科医生手中似乎是可行且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f6b/11628427/5e88ba0a62d4/13304_2024_2017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f6b/11628427/5e88ba0a62d4/13304_2024_2017_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f6b/11628427/5e88ba0a62d4/13304_2024_2017_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Simultaneous treatment of large hiatal hernias during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical considerations and outcome.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中同期治疗大型食管裂孔疝:技术要点与结果
Updates Surg. 2024 Dec;76(8):2973-2976. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02017-9. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Subjective improvement of reflux symptoms after conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and concomitant repair of hiatal hernia.胃袖状切除术转换为Roux-en-Y胃旁路术并同时修复食管裂孔疝后反流症状的主观改善
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Mar;21(3):256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.09.014. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
3
Hiatal hernia repair after previous laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.既往腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后的食管裂孔疝修补术
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 May;20(5):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of symptomatic paraesophageal hernia in the morbidly obese: medium-term results.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖患者的症状性食管旁疝:中期结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1063-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Late-"de novo" paraesophageal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-should it be repaired?Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)后迟发性食管裂孔疝(paraesophageal hernia,PEH)——是否需要修补?
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5974-5979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11083-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): who is more at risk? A multicenter study.胃旁路手术(OAGB)转为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术(RYGB)治疗胃食管反流病(GERD):谁的风险更高?一项多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1163-1169. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10611-y. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
7
Repairing small type I hiatal hernias at the time of RYGB is not necessary to achieve resolution of reflux symptoms.在 RYGB 时修复小的 I 型食管裂孔疝对于缓解反流症状并非必要。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4910-4916. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09653-5. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
Laparoscopic management of reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the LINX system and repair of hiatal hernia: a case report.使用LINX系统对Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后反流进行腹腔镜管理及修复食管裂孔疝:一例报告
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):e51-e54. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.037. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Massive Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Obese Patient Population: Antireflux Gastric Bypass Versus Fundoplication.肥胖患者群体中的巨大食管旁疝修补术:抗反流胃旁路术与胃底折叠术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1038-1042. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0019. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
10
Redo fundoplication vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion for failed anti-reflux surgery: which is better?抗反流手术后复发行再次胃底折叠术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术转换:哪种方法更好?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6429-6437. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10074-1. Epub 2023 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of elective repair of large hiatus hernias in the morbidly obese: a cohort study.病态肥胖患者大型食管裂孔疝择期修补术的结局:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4376-4385. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11808-z. Epub 2025 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility and Outcomes of Simultaneous Gastric Bypass with Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients.老年患者行胃旁路手术同时修补食管裂孔疝的可行性和结局。
Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2734-2741. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06726-9. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
2
Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).胃食管反流病(GERD)治疗的多学会共识会议及指南
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):781-806. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09817-3. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
3
Massive Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in the Obese Patient Population: Antireflux Gastric Bypass Versus Fundoplication.
肥胖患者群体中的巨大食管旁疝修补术:抗反流胃旁路术与胃底折叠术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1038-1042. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0019. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD).SAGES 指南:胃食管反流(GERD)的手术治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4903-4917. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08625-5. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Concurrent hiatal hernia repair and bariatric surgery: outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.同期食管裂孔疝修补术和减重手术:袖状胃切除术和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后的结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jan;17(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
6
Combined treatment of symptomatic massive paraesophageal hernia in the morbidly obese.病态肥胖患者有症状的巨大食管旁疝的联合治疗
JSLS. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):188-92. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985132164.
7
Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes.谁会在腹腔镜下尼森胃底折叠术(Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication)中失败?长期预后的术前预测。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1978-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9490-7. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
8
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
9
Obesity adversely affects the outcome of antireflux operations.肥胖会对抗反流手术的结果产生不利影响。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Sep;15(9):986-9. doi: 10.1007/s004640000392. Epub 2001 Jun 12.