Mehanna Hisham, Nankivell Paul, Boelaert Kristien, Woolley Rebecca, Sharma Neil, Sidhu Paul S, Madani Gitta, Da Forno Philip, Moreman Catherine, Palmer Andrew, Fulton-Lieuw Tessa, Taylor Judith, Rajaguru Kanchana, Bekker Jasper, Vaidhyanath Ram, Rehman Thaj, Deeks Jon
Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Robert Aitken Building, 2nd Floor, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Robert Aitken Building, 2nd Floor, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Oct 3. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae682.
ElaTION is a large multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled trial, performed in 18 secondary/tertiary hospitals across England, comparing elastography ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) with ultrasound-guided FNAC (US-FNAC) alone in the diagnostic assessment of thyroid nodules. Secondary trial outcomes, reported here, assessed the accuracy of ultrasound-alone (US) compared with US-guided FNAC to inform and update current practice guidelines.
Adults with single or multiple thyroid nodules who had not undergone previous FNAC were eligible. Radiologists assessed all thyroid nodules using US alone, thereby enabling assessment of its accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) versus US-FNAC.
Of the 982 participants, a final definitive diagnosis was obtained in 688, who were included in the final analyses. The sensitivity of US-alone was the same as US-FNAC (0.91, [95% CI 0.85, 0.97] vs 0.87 [95%CI 0.80-0.95], p=0.37). US alone had statistically significant lower specificity than US-FNAC alone (0.48 vs 0.67 respectively, p<0.0001). The malignancy rate on histology in a nodule classified as benign on ultrasound (U2) was 9/263 (3.42%) and on cytology (Thy2) was 15/353 (4.25%), whereas the malignancy rate in a nodule that was benign on both (U2, Thy2) was 3/210 (1.43%). Malignancy risk for U3, U4, and U5 nodules was 68/304 (22.4%), 43/83 (51.8%), and 29/38 (76.3%) respectively (p<0.0001). Yet 80/982 (8%) patients were discharged despite having U3-U5 scans with Thy1 (non-diagnostic) FNAC and no definitive diagnosis.Malignancy risk was higher in smaller nodules: <10mm 23/60 (38.3%), 10-20mm 46/162 (28.4 %), and >20mm 80/466 (17.2%) (p<0.0001). Nodules with indeterminate cytology with atypical features (Thy3a) carried a similar malignancy risk to those with indeterminate cytology (Thy3/3f): 27/95 (28.4%) versus 42/113 (37.2%) respectively (p=0.18).
Ultrasound alone appears to be an effective diagnostic modality in thyroid nodules, confirming the recommendations of recent guidelines and the BTA classification. However, findings also suggest caution regarding existing recommendations for conservative management of non-diagnostic (Thy1/Bethesda I) and atypical (Thy3a/Bethesda III) nodules. In those cases, ultrasound (U3-5) features may help identify high-risk subgroups for more proactive management.
ElaTION是一项大型多中心实用随机对照试验,在英国18家二级/三级医院开展,比较弹性成像超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNAC)与单纯超声引导下细针穿刺活检(US-FNAC)在甲状腺结节诊断评估中的效果。本文报告的次要试验结果评估了单纯超声(US)与超声引导下细针穿刺活检相比的准确性,以为当前的实践指南提供信息并进行更新。
纳入未曾接受过细针穿刺活检的单发或多发甲状腺结节成年患者。放射科医生仅使用超声对所有甲状腺结节进行评估,从而能够评估其相对于超声引导下细针穿刺活检的准确性(敏感性和特异性)。
982名参与者中,688人获得了最终确诊,并纳入最终分析。单纯超声的敏感性与超声引导下细针穿刺活检相同(0.91,[95%置信区间0.85,0.97] 对比0.87 [95%置信区间0.80 - 0.95],p = 0.37)。单纯超声的特异性在统计学上显著低于单纯超声引导下细针穿刺活检(分别为0.48和0.67,p < 0.0001)。超声检查为良性(U2)的结节,组织学恶性率为9/263(3.42%),细胞学检查为良性(Thy2)的结节,恶性率为15/353(4.25%),而两者均为良性(U2,Thy2)的结节,恶性率为3/210(1.43%)。U3、U4和U5类结节的恶性风险分别为68/304(22.4%)、43/83(51.8%)和29/38(76.3%)(p < 0.0001)。然而,982名患者中有80人(8%)尽管进行了U3 - U5扫描且细针穿刺活检结果为Thy1(无法诊断),但仍未得到明确诊断就出院了。较小结节的恶性风险更高:<10mm为23/60(38.3%),10 - 20mm为46/162(28.4%),>20mm为80/466(17.2%)(p < 0.000