Suppr超能文献

孕酮对绝经后女性血管舒缩症状的影响(PROGEST)——一项前瞻性多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验(RDPCT)

Effects of Progesterone on Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women (PROGEST) - a Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial (RDPCT).

作者信息

Beinert Sissi Valentina, Kleinsorge Frauke, Worm Julia, Tropschuh Katharina Victoria, Seifert-Klauss Vanadin

机构信息

AG Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde im Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health der TU München (TUM), München, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Oct 1;84(10):969-978. doi: 10.1055/a-2322-0967. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Monotherapy with progesterone for treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was more effective than placebo treatment of postmenopausal healthy women in a Canadian trial. The PROGEST-trial was initiated to fulfill FDA-approval criteria for the indication of treatment of postmenopausal VMS. This prospective randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial studied three doses of oral micronized progesterone (200 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg) and placebo for 12 weeks. Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe VMS (> 50 per week) were screened for one week for VMS frequency, then randomized to 200, 300 or 400 mg progesterone daily or placebo for a double-blinded trial of 12 weeks duration. 74 women were recruited in 12 study centers. 44 terminated the study as per protocol (PP). Moderate to severe hot flushes decreased by 7.4/d in the placebo arm, 7.7 VMS/d with 200 mg/d progesterone (P4), 8.3 VMS/d on 300 mg/d and 9.0 VMS/d on 400 mg/d P4, respectively by week 12. 32 treatment emergent adverse events were documented in 18 participants, mostly minor AEs. The only SAE was a syncope requiring hospitalization on the day after treatment initiation, leading to discontinuation of the drug. Baseline VMS frequency was much higher in the German than in the Canadian study and the course of the placebo group had a markedly stronger decrease in VMS-frequency during the PROGEST study (-7.4/d) than in the Canadian trial (-1.4/d). Trial populations differed by age, BMI, the number of women with natural menopause, and comorbidities, mainly hypertension. Premature discontinuation of the trial due to insufficient subject accrual rate led to only 55 randomized participants for analysis, therefore the study results lack statistical power. Still, a slight dose-dependent improvement in VMS was seen for all doses, while AE frequency did not increase with progesterone dose.

摘要

在一项加拿大试验中,对于绝经后健康女性,单用孕酮治疗血管舒缩症状(VMS)比安慰剂治疗更有效。启动PROGEST试验是为了满足美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对绝经后VMS治疗适应症的批准标准。这项前瞻性随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验研究了三种口服微粉化孕酮剂量(200毫克、300毫克、400毫克)和安慰剂,为期12周。对有中度至重度VMS(每周>50次)的绝经后女性进行为期一周的VMS频率筛查,然后随机分为每日服用200、300或400毫克孕酮组或安慰剂组,进行为期12周的双盲试验。12个研究中心招募了74名女性。44名按照方案(PP)终止了研究。到第12周时,安慰剂组中重度潮热分别减少7.4次/天,孕酮剂量为200毫克/天(P4)时VMS减少7.7次/天,300毫克/天减少8.3次/天,400毫克/天P4减少9.0次/天。18名参与者记录了32例治疗出现的不良事件,大多为轻微不良事件。唯一的严重不良事件是在开始治疗后第二天发生的一次需要住院治疗的晕厥,导致停药。德国研究中的基线VMS频率远高于加拿大研究,且在PROGEST研究期间,安慰剂组的VMS频率下降幅度(-7.4次/天)明显强于加拿大试验(-1.4次/天)。试验人群在年龄、体重指数、自然绝经女性数量和合并症(主要是高血压)方面存在差异。由于受试者入组率不足导致试验提前终止,仅55名随机参与者可供分析,因此研究结果缺乏统计学效力。尽管如此,所有剂量的VMS均有轻微的剂量依赖性改善,而不良事件频率并未随孕酮剂量增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef98/11444746/a3d30fe77f29/10-1055-a-2322-0967-igf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验