Caliskan Elif Buse, Bingel Ulrike, Kunkel Angelika
Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pain Rep. 2024 Mar 25;9(2):e1142. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001142. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Positive and negative treatment expectations are powerful modulators of health and treatment outcomes. A substantial part of treatment success is due to contextual factors modulating patient's expectations towards a treatment. Consequently, treatment expectations should be a target of therapeutic interventions themselves.
This article highlights the neurobiological underpinnings of treatment expectations as well as strategies to modulate contextual factors to optimize treatment outcomes in daily clinical settings.
This clinical update aligns with the 2022 IASP Global Year Translating Pain Knowledge into Practice and selectively reviews the best available evidence and practice.
The effects of treatment expectations, also known as placebo and nocebo effects, are observed in various clinical conditions and physiological systems. However, most of our knowledge comes from the field of pain, where expectation effects substantially contribute to overall analgesic treatment outcomes. Experimental placebo analgesia paradigms provide the best illustration of how analgesic effects can be attributed not only to a pharmacological or specific treatment, but instead are the result of the expectation towards the treatment. The impact of expectations on treatment outcome is highly variable between individuals, and the identification of factors predicting an individual's response has proven to be challenging. Further research is required to provide personalized treatment strategies for the daily clinical practice.
Patient's previous experiences and expectations are powerful modulators of treatment efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. By providing a comprehensive overview of recent advances in this field, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to improve patient-clinician interaction.
积极和消极的治疗期望是健康和治疗结果的有力调节因素。治疗成功的很大一部分归因于调节患者对治疗期望的背景因素。因此,治疗期望本身应成为治疗干预的目标。
本文重点介绍治疗期望的神经生物学基础,以及在日常临床环境中调节背景因素以优化治疗结果的策略。
本临床综述与2022年国际疼痛研究协会全球“将疼痛知识转化为实践”年度活动相一致,有选择地回顾了现有最佳证据和实践。
治疗期望的效果,也称为安慰剂和反安慰剂效应,在各种临床病症和生理系统中都有观察到。然而,我们的大部分知识来自疼痛领域,在该领域,期望效应在总体镇痛治疗结果中起着重要作用。实验性安慰剂镇痛范例最能说明镇痛效果不仅可归因于药物或特定治疗,而是对治疗期望的结果。期望对治疗结果的影响在个体之间差异很大,事实证明,识别预测个体反应的因素具有挑战性。需要进一步研究以提供日常临床实践中的个性化治疗策略。
患者以前的经历和期望是治疗效果、耐受性和依从性的有力调节因素。通过全面概述该领域的最新进展,本综述为寻求改善医患互动的临床医生和研究人员提供了有价值的见解。