• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗合并灌注不良的B型主动脉夹层的疗效评估

Evaluation of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion.

作者信息

Kato Hiroaki, Kato Noriyuki, Ouchi Takafumi, Higashigawa Takatoshi, Ito Hisato, Nakajima Ken, Chino Shuji, Tokui Toshiya, Mizumoto Toru, Oue Kensuke, Ichikawa Yasutaka, Sakuma Hajime

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Dis. 2024 Sep 25;17(3):248-254. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

DOI:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036
PMID:39359567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11444820/
Abstract

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion. This retrospective study included patients who underwent TEVAR for the treatment of TBAD complicated by malperfusion from June 1998 to June 2022 in four institutions. In addition to the common outcomes, including short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity, the preservation of each organ was investigated. A total of 23 patients were included in this analysis. The 30-day mortality was 4% (1/23) of the patients. The overall survival rate was 87% at 1 year. The preservation rate of each organ was 33% (4/12) for the visceral organs, 85% (17/20) for the kidneys, and 100% (18/18) for the legs. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference in the preservation rate between the viscera and the other organs ( = 0.018 vs. kidneys, = 0.0025 vs. legs). It was shown that the survival rate of patients with visceral malperfusion was significantly lower than that of patients with non-visceral malperfusion ( = 0.006). In terms of mortality, TEVAR showed satisfactory results. The preservation of visceral organs was still challenging even with TEVAR and adjunctive measures.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗合并灌注不良的B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的疗效。这项回顾性研究纳入了1998年6月至2022年6月期间在四家机构接受TEVAR治疗合并灌注不良的TBAD患者。除了包括短期和中期死亡率及发病率等常见结局外,还对各器官的保留情况进行了研究。本分析共纳入23例患者。患者的30天死亡率为4%(1/23)。1年时的总生存率为87%。内脏器官的保留率为33%(4/12),肾脏为85%(17/20),下肢为100%(18/18)。Fisher精确检验显示,内脏与其他器官的保留率存在显著差异(与肾脏相比,P = 0.018;与下肢相比,P = 0.0025)。结果表明,内脏灌注不良患者的生存率显著低于非内脏灌注不良患者(P = 0.006)。在死亡率方面,TEVAR显示出令人满意的结果。即使采用TEVAR及辅助措施,内脏器官的保留仍然具有挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da3/11444820/bcd24d3f13b7/avd-17-248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da3/11444820/bcd24d3f13b7/avd-17-248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da3/11444820/bcd24d3f13b7/avd-17-248-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗合并灌注不良的B型主动脉夹层的疗效评估
Ann Vasc Dis. 2024 Sep 25;17(3):248-254. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.24-00036. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
Adjunctive branch interventions during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute complicated type B dissection are not associated with inferior outcomes.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗急性复杂型 B 型夹层时附加分支血管干预与不良结局无关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.028. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with stent grafts alone or with a composite device design in patients with acute type B aortic dissection in the setting of malperfusion.胸主动脉腔内修复术单独使用支架移植物或使用复合装置设计在灌注不良的急性 B 型主动脉夹层患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Feb;71(2):400-407.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.478. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Implications of secondary aortic intervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and chronic type B dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术后治疗急性和慢性 B 型夹层的二次主动脉干预的意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.080. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中存在灌注不良的 B 型主动脉夹层患者的独特特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.11.047. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Dynamic and Static Vessel Malperfusion as a Consequence of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.急性 B 型主动脉夹层所致的动态和静态血管灌注不良。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
Outcomes of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection and High-Risk Features.急性 B 型主动脉夹层伴高危特征患者的转归。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;106:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
8
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) First in Patients with Lower Limb Ischemia in Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Clinical Outcome and Morphology.胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)在复杂B型主动脉夹层合并下肢缺血患者中的首次应用:临床结果与形态学
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 17;11(14):4154. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144154.
9
Surgical and endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections with mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A systematic review of in-hospital mortality.伴有肠系膜灌注不良综合征的B型主动脉夹层的手术及血管腔内修复术:住院死亡率的系统评价
JTCVS Open. 2022 Aug 8;12:37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.012. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Emergency endovascular stent-grafting for acute type B aortic dissection with symptomatic malperfusion.症状性灌注不良的急性B型主动脉夹层的急诊血管内支架植入术
Int Angiol. 2013 Oct;32(5):483-91.

本文引用的文献

1
Five-year results of the STABLE II study for the endovascular treatment of complicated, acute type B aortic dissection with a composite device design.STABLE II 研究:复合器械设计腔内治疗复杂急性 B 型主动脉夹层的 5 年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;76(5):1189-1197.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.092. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study).不同适应证的急性/亚急性Stanford B 型主动脉夹层行 TEVAR 治疗的患者结局和并发症比较:来自日本胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗复杂 B 型主动脉夹层的回顾性多中心研究(J-Predictive 研究)的数据。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):290-297. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Donor Warm Ischemia Time in DCD Liver Transplantation-Working Group Report From the ILTS DCD, Liver Preservation, and Machine Perfusion Consensus Conference.供者热缺血时间在 DCD 肝移植中的作用——来自 ILTS DCD、肝脏保存和机器灌注共识会议的工作组报告。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1156-1164. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003819.
4
Five-year outcomes of endovascular repair of complicated acute type B aortic dissections.复杂急性B型主动脉夹层腔内修复的五年结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):539-548.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.162. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Endovascular Therapy for Nonischemic vs Ischemic Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.非缺血性与缺血性复杂急性 B 型主动脉夹层的血管内治疗。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Feb;27(1):145-152. doi: 10.1177/1526602819888672. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
Management of acute type B aortic dissection with malperfusion via endovascular fenestration/stenting.经血管内开窗/支架置入术治疗伴灌注不良的急性 B 型主动脉夹层的管理。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Nov;160(5):1151-1161.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.065. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Malperfusions in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection-Predictors of Outcomes.急性B型主动脉夹层的灌注不良——预后的预测因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Managing patients with acute type A aortic dissection and mesenteric malperfusion syndrome: A 20-year experience.管理急性 A 型主动脉夹层合并肠系膜动脉灌注不良综合征患者:20 年经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):675-687.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.127. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Thoracic endovascular repair for acute complicated type B aortic dissections.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗急性复杂型 B 型主动脉夹层。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.234.
10
Editor's Choice - Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——降主动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;53(1):4-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005.