Suppr超能文献

神经肌肉门户与匹配:朝着更公平、公正和透明的流程努力。

The Neuromuscular Portal and Match: Working Toward a More Fair, Equitable, and Transparent Process.

作者信息

Laughlin Ruple S, Adkins Shirlyn, Baer Michael, Dehbashi Sara, Gable Karissa, Govindarajan Raghav, Guidon Amanda C, Gwathmey Kelly G, Hehir Michael K, Imperioli Matthew, Price Raymond S, Sakamuri Sarada, Sokol Jacob, Tiongson Noelle, Wong Ericka S, London Zachary

机构信息

From the Mayo Clinic (R.S.L.); AANEM (S.A., J.S.), Rochester, MN; University of Pennsylvania (M.B., R.S.P.); Thomas Jefferson University (S.D., E.S.W.), Philadelphia, PA; Duke University (K.G.), Durham, NC; University of Missouri (R.G.), St. Louis; Department of Neurology (A.C.G.), Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Virginia Commonwealth University (K.G.G.), Richmond; University of Vermont (M.K.H.), Burlington; University of Connecticut (M.I.), Storrs; Department of Neurological Sciences (S.S.), Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Keck USC College of Medicine (N.T.), Los Angeles, CA; and University of Michigan (Z.L.), Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Neurol Educ. 2023 Aug 23;2(3):e200086. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200086. eCollection 2023 Sep 25.

Abstract

Prior to 2021, the neuromuscular medicine fellowship application process suffered from non-standardized timelines and substantial variability. To rectify this, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) established a standardized application timeline and an online application portal in 2020-2021, followed by the introduction of a partial match process. In 2021-2022, AANEM launched a traditional, binding, two-way match system for fellowship positions allocation based on the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. Surveys assessing perceptions of fairness in the application portal and match process were dispatched to applicants and program directors following the 2021 and 2022 recruitment cycles. In the 2020-21 cycle, 90% of program directors and 95% of applicants affirmed the standardized timeline benefited applicants. However, 57% of applicants deemed the process as unfair. All programs and most applicants (58%) favored a transition to a two-way match. The implementation of the two-way match in 2021-22 attracted participation from 97% of programs, with 80% of applicants and 95% of programs viewing the process as fair to applicants. A significant majority of both applicants (86%) and programs (94%) supported maintaining the standardized timeline and two-way match. We advocate for the universal adoption of the AANEM Match for neuromuscular fellowship recruitment and a standardized fellowship application timeline across all neurologic specialties to promote transparency, fairness, and equity for applicants.

摘要

在2021年之前,神经肌肉医学专科培训申请流程存在时间线不规范和显著差异的问题。为纠正这一情况,美国神经肌肉与电诊断医学协会(AANEM)在2020 - 2021年建立了标准化的申请时间线和在线申请门户,随后引入了部分匹配流程。在2021 - 2022年,AANEM基于盖尔 - 沙普利稳定匹配算法推出了用于专科培训职位分配的传统、有约束力的双向匹配系统。在2021年和2022年招聘周期结束后,向申请人和项目主任发放了评估对申请门户和匹配流程公平性看法的调查问卷。在2020 - 21周期,90%的项目主任和95%的申请人确认标准化时间线对申请人有益。然而,57%的申请人认为该流程不公平。所有项目以及大多数申请人(58%)都倾向于过渡到双向匹配。2021 - 22年双向匹配的实施吸引了97%的项目参与,80%的申请人和95%的项目认为该流程对申请人公平。绝大多数申请人(86%)和项目(94%)都支持维持标准化时间线和双向匹配。我们主张在神经肌肉专科培训招聘中普遍采用AANEM匹配方式,并在所有神经科专业中采用标准化的专科培训申请时间线,以提高透明度,为申请人促进公平和公正。

相似文献

2
The neuromuscular fellowship portal and match.神经肌肉 fellowship门户和匹配。
Muscle Nerve. 2022 Jun;65(6):640-645. doi: 10.1002/mus.27525. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
Outcomes in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Match, 2010-2017.2010 - 2017年骨科运动医学专科医师匹配结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May 15;6(5):2325967118771845. doi: 10.1177/2325967118771845. eCollection 2018 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Missing Full Disclosures.完整披露信息缺失。
Neurol Educ. 2024 Dec 30;4(1):e200172. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200172. eCollection 2025 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验