• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用于胰腺癌内镜超声引导下组织获取的针具的基因获取率和质量

Evaluation of Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Cancer for Genetic Yield and Quality.

作者信息

Tiong Jonathan, Nguyen Phi, Sritharan Mithra, Lundy Joanne, Shen Henry, Kumar Beena, Swan Michael, Jenkins Brendan, Croagh Daniel

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS.

Centre for Innate Immunity and Infectious Diseases, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, AUS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 2;16(9):e68431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68431. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.68431
PMID:39360054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11445693/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) is the gold standard in tissue acquisition of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is a paucity of evidence of the impact of needle type or size on the genetic yield and quality.

METHODS

Patients 18 years and older with PDAC who underwent FNB were retrospectively identified from a single database from 2016 to 2021. Genetic quantity is measured in micrograms (µg) and quality defined by RNA or DNA integrity number (RIN and DIN). FNB needles examined were Acquire 22 gauge (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and ProCore 22 and 20 gauges (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA).

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-seven patients were identified. ProCore 20G needle procured higher RNA quantity (4125.8µg, IQR: 2003.8, 5954.8, p = 0.012) compared to ProCore 22G (2050µg IQR: 966.4, 3181.6) and Acquire 22G (2310.6µg, IQR: 1439.3, 4312). Median DNA quantity was 3340.5µg (Acquire 22G), 2610.4µg (ProCore 22G) and 3499.7µg (ProCore 20G) (p = 0.763). Median DIN was 7.3 (Acquire 22G and ProCore 22G) and 7.4 (ProCore 20G) (p = 0.449). Median RIN was 3.0 (Acquire 22G and ProCore 22G) and 2.7 (ProCore 20G) (p = 0.886).

CONCLUSION

ProCore 20G was associated with higher quantity of RNA. There were no differences in the quality acquired by different needles.

摘要

背景

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检（FNB）是胰腺导管腺癌（PDAC）组织获取的金标准。关于针型或尺寸对基因产量和质量影响的证据较少。

方法

从2016年至2021年的单一数据库中回顾性识别出18岁及以上接受FNB的PDAC患者。基因数量以微克（µg）为单位进行测量，质量由RNA或DNA完整性数值（RIN和DIN）定义。所检查的FNB针包括22号Acquire针（美国马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒市波士顿科学公司）以及22号和20号ProCore针（美国印第安纳州布卢明顿市库克医疗公司）。

结果

共识别出277例患者。与22号ProCore针（2050µg，四分位间距：966.4，3181.6）和22号Acquire针（2310.6µg，四分位间距：1439.3，4312）相比，20号ProCore针获取的RNA数量更高（4125.8µg，四分位间距：2003.8，5954.8，p = 0.012）。DNA数量中位数分别为3340.5µg（22号Acquire针）、2610.4µg（22号ProCore针）和3499.7µg（20号ProCore针）（p = 0.763）。DIN中位数分别为7.3（22号Acquire针和22号ProCore针）和7.4（20号ProCore针）（p = 0.449）。RIN中位数分别为3.0（22号Acquire针和22号ProCore针）和2.7（20号ProCore针）（p = 0.886）。

结论

20号ProCore针与更高的RNA数量相关。不同针获取的质量无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/cb3f7ebfc543/cureus-0016-00000068431-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/e9e835643d5d/cureus-0016-00000068431-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/fbc4b8bf4d48/cureus-0016-00000068431-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/dc65e13b773e/cureus-0016-00000068431-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/f90637c3852c/cureus-0016-00000068431-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/1580c6043e87/cureus-0016-00000068431-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/94debfdfd9cb/cureus-0016-00000068431-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/c4a67860a39a/cureus-0016-00000068431-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/a50925dbed78/cureus-0016-00000068431-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/dfe5dd735658/cureus-0016-00000068431-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/cb3f7ebfc543/cureus-0016-00000068431-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/e9e835643d5d/cureus-0016-00000068431-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/fbc4b8bf4d48/cureus-0016-00000068431-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/dc65e13b773e/cureus-0016-00000068431-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/f90637c3852c/cureus-0016-00000068431-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/1580c6043e87/cureus-0016-00000068431-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/94debfdfd9cb/cureus-0016-00000068431-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/c4a67860a39a/cureus-0016-00000068431-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/a50925dbed78/cureus-0016-00000068431-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/dfe5dd735658/cureus-0016-00000068431-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f236/11445693/cb3f7ebfc543/cureus-0016-00000068431-i10.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Cancer for Genetic Yield and Quality.评估用于胰腺癌内镜超声引导下组织获取的针具的基因获取率和质量
Cureus. 2024 Sep 2;16(9):e68431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68431. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
22G Acquire vs. 20G Procore needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of pancreatic masses: a randomized study comparing histologic sample quantity and diagnostic accuracy.22G 与 20G Procore 针用于内镜超声引导下胰腺肿块活检：比较组织学样本数量和诊断准确性的随机研究。
Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):747-753. doi: 10.1055/a-1160-5485. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.新型侧刃 20G 针超声内镜引导下胰腺实性病变组织获取的组织学回收率。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/2050640618804443. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
4
IS THE NEW PROCORE 20G DOUBLE FORWARD-BEVEL NEEDLE CAPABLE TO OBTAIN BETTER HISTOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND FOR DIAGNOSING SOLID PANCREATIC LESIONS?新的 Procore 20G 双向前斜口套管针能否通过内镜超声诊断实性胰腺病变获得更好的组织学样本？
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 Jan 25;33(4):e1554. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020200004e1554. eCollection 2021.
5
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.内镜超声引导下实性胰腺肿块采样：22号穿刺针抽吸与25号活检针活检的比较
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9.
6
Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better?19G 与 22G 抽吸针在超声内镜引导下对黏膜下肿瘤进行细针穿刺活检的比较：更大是否更好？
J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Apr;43(4):761-770. doi: 10.1002/jum.16405. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
7
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles.内镜超声引导下胰腺实性病变穿刺活检：25G 与 22G 切割式活检针的对比分析。
Anticancer Res. 2020 Oct;40(10):5845-5851. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14603.
8
Comparison of 20-gauge Procore® and 22-gauge Acquire® needles for EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic masses: an observational study.20号Procore®针与22号Acquire®针用于实性胰腺肿块EUS-FNB的比较：一项观察性研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;54(4):499-505. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1599418. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Optimal number of needle passes during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with 22G ProCore needles and different suction techniques: A randomized controlled trial.使用22G ProCore针及不同抽吸技术对胰腺实性病变进行EUS引导下细针穿刺活检时的最佳穿刺次数：一项随机对照试验
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Jan-Feb;10(1):62-70. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00147.
10
An animal experimental study to assess the core tissue acquisition ability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided histology needles.一项评估内镜超声引导下组织学穿刺针核心组织获取能力的动物实验研究。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Jul-Aug;7(4):263-269. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_16_17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Utility of Endoscopic-Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下对胰腺实性病变进行组织获取的效用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 19;12(3):753. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030753.
2
EUS-FNA Biopsies to Guide Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study to Identify Wild-Type Tumours for Targeted Therapy.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检用于指导胰腺癌精准医疗：一项识别野生型肿瘤以进行靶向治疗的试点研究结果
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 9;11:770022. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.770022. eCollection 2021.
3
Targeted Transcriptome and Mutation Analysis Improve the Diagnostic Performance of EUS-FNA Biopsies in Pancreatic Cancer.
靶向转录组和突变分析提高了超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检在胰腺癌诊断中的性能。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Nov 1;27(21):5900-5911. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1107. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Overcoming the Challenges of High Quality RNA Extraction from Core Needle Biopsy.从核心针活检中提取高质量 RNA 面临的挑战及应对方法
Biomolecules. 2021 Apr 22;11(5):621. doi: 10.3390/biom11050621.
5
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.胰腺导管腺癌临床实践指南（第 2.2021 版），NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017.
6
Effectiveness of introducing a 20-gauge core biopsy needle with a core trap in EUS-FNA/B for diagnosing pancreatic cancer.在 EUS-FNA/B 中引入带有核心捕捉器的 20 号活检针对诊断胰腺癌的效果。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01583-7.
7
RNA Extraction from Endoscopic Ultrasound-Acquired Tissue of Pancreatic Cancer Is Feasible and Allows Investigation of Molecular Features.从胰腺癌内镜超声获取的组织中提取RNA是可行的，并能够对分子特征进行研究。
Cells. 2020 Nov 30;9(12):2561. doi: 10.3390/cells9122561.
8
Molecular Profiling-Based Precision Medicine in Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence and Challenges.基于分子谱分析的癌症精准医学：当前证据与挑战综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 27;10:532403. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.532403. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.对比内镜超声引导下细针活检与细针抽吸在胰腺癌基因谱分析和 DNA 产量方面的效果：一项随机交叉试验。
Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):376-382. doi: 10.1055/a-1223-2171. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Adverse events and mortality: comparative analysis between diagnostic and interventional endoscopic ultrasound.不良事件和死亡率：诊断性和介入性内镜超声比较分析。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;55(8):995-1001. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1792975. Epub 2020 Jul 14.