• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

含三氯生涂层缝线的筋膜缝合对腹壁裂开发生率的影响:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析

The Effect of Fascial Closure With Triclosan-Coated Sutures on the Incidence of Abdominal Wall Dehiscence: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Timmer Allard S, Wolfhagen Niels, Pianka Frank, Knebel Phillip, Justinger Christoph, Stravodimos Christos, Ichida Kosuke, Rikiyama Toshiki, Baracs József, Vereczkei András, Gianotti Luca, Sandini Marta, Ruiz-Tovar Jaime, Marc-Hernández Artur, Nakamura Toru, Dijkgraaf Marcel G W, Boermeester Marja A, de Jonge Stijn W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Sep 18;3:13337. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13337. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/jaws.2024.13337
PMID:39360221
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11444969/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Wound closure with triclosan-coated sutures (TCS) appears to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Because there is a strong association between postoperative SSI and the development of acute abdominal wall dehiscence (AWD) after laparotomy, we hypothesized that the use of TCS for wound closure after laparotomy may also reduce the risk of AWD.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched from their inception to 01 November 2022. Randomized trials that compared the use of TCS with identical but uncoated sutures for fascial closure were eligible if they could provide individual participant data (IPD) on AWD. From these trials, we only included in the analysis those subjects who underwent open abdominal surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of AWD within 30 days postoperatively, requiring emergency reoperation. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology (PROSPERO: CRD42019121173.

RESULTS

We identified twelve eligible trials. Eight studies shared IPD. The incidence of AWD within 30 days after surgery was 27/1,565 (1.7%) in the TCS group vs. 40/1,430 (2.8%) in the control group (Relative Risk: 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.11, = 0%, τ = 0.00]). The certainty of evidence was moderate after downgrading for imprecision. The incidence of incisional SSI was 163/1,576 (10.3%) vs. 198/1,439 (13.8%), RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.97).

CONCLUSION

We found no conclusive evidence to support the use of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of acute abdominal wall dehiscence after laparotomy. In these selected studies, a significant reduction in incisional SSI was observed.

摘要

引言

使用三氯生涂层缝线(TCS)进行伤口缝合似乎可降低手术部位感染(SSI)的风险。由于术后SSI与剖腹手术后急性腹壁裂开(AWD)的发生之间存在密切关联,我们推测剖腹手术后使用TCS进行伤口缝合也可能降低AWD的风险。

方法

检索MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年11月1日。比较使用TCS与相同但未涂层缝线进行筋膜缝合的随机试验,如果能够提供AWD的个体参与者数据(IPD)则符合纳入标准。从这些试验中,我们仅将接受开放性腹部手术的受试者纳入分析。主要结局是术后30天内需要急诊再次手术的AWD发生率。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性(PROSPERO:CRD42019121173)。

结果

我们确定了12项符合条件的试验。8项研究共享了IPD。TCS组术后30天内AWD的发生率为27/1565(1.7%),对照组为40/1430(2.8%)(相对风险:0.70 [95%置信区间(CI)0.44 - 1.11,I² = 0%,τ = 0.00])。因不精确性降级后,证据的确定性为中等。切口SSI的发生率为163/1576(10.3%) vs. 198/1439(13.8%),RR 0.80(95% CI 0.67 - 0.97)。

结论

我们没有找到确凿证据支持使用三氯生涂层缝线预防剖腹手术后的急性腹壁裂开。在这些选定的研究中,观察到切口SSI有显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5369/11444969/3c55db4663cd/jaws-03-13337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5369/11444969/3c55db4663cd/jaws-03-13337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5369/11444969/3c55db4663cd/jaws-03-13337-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Fascial Closure With Triclosan-Coated Sutures on the Incidence of Abdominal Wall Dehiscence: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.含三氯生涂层缝线的筋膜缝合对腹壁裂开发生率的影响:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Sep 18;3:13337. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13337. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of triclosan-coated sutures for abdominal wound closure on the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence: a protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis.三氯生涂层缝线用于腹部伤口缝合对腹部伤口裂开发生率的影响:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 23;12(2):e054534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054534.
3
Triclosan-coated sutures and surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: the TRISTAN review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹部手术中三氯生涂层缝线与手术部位感染:TRISTAN综述、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1681-0. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Loop Suture vs Polydioxanone Loop Suture in Emergent Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹部紧急外科手术后,采用三氯生涂层倒刺缝线与三氯生涂层聚二氧环己酮环缝线与聚二氧环己酮缝线行切口缝合的手术部位感染发生率:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical site infection in abdominal surgery between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures.系统评价和荟萃分析比较了腹部手术中使用三氯生涂层缝线和未涂层缝线的手术部位感染。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1017-1027. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03045-5. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy.带倒刺的缝线是否更好?评价三氯生涂层带倒刺缝线在急诊剖腹手术后伤口并发症中的应用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jul 1;97(1):149-157. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004341. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
The effectiveness of fascial closure with antimicrobial-coated sutures in preventing incisional surgical site infections in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗菌涂层缝线缝合筋膜在预防胃肠手术切口部位感染中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Apr;146:174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
8
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
9
Effectiveness of Triclosan-Coated Sutures Compared with Uncoated Sutures in Preventing Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Wall Closure in Open/Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.三氯生涂层缝线与未涂层缝线在预防开腹/腹腔镜结直肠手术后腹壁关闭部位手术部位感染的效果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Jun 1;234(6):1147-1159. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000167. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Effect of the Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Sutures in Fecal Peritonitis, on Surgical Site Infection, and Evisceration: A Retrospective Multi-Center Study.含三氯生涂层缝线的腹部筋膜闭合术在粪性腹膜炎中对手术部位感染及肠管脱出的影响:一项回顾性多中心研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):61-64. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.171.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of triclosan-coated sutures for abdominal wound closure on the incidence of abdominal wound dehiscence: a protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis.三氯生涂层缝线用于腹部伤口缝合对腹部伤口裂开发生率的影响:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 23;12(2):e054534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054534.
2
Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial.在中低收入国家减少手术部位感染(隼鹰):一项实用的、多中心的、分层的、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1687-1699. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01548-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Loop Suture vs Polydioxanone Loop Suture in Emergent Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
腹部紧急外科手术后,采用三氯生涂层倒刺缝线与三氯生涂层聚二氧环己酮环缝线与聚二氧环己酮缝线行切口缝合的手术部位感染发生率:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
5
Effect of Triclosan-Coated Suture on Surgical Site Infection of Abdominal Fascial Closures.三氯生涂层缝线对腹部筋膜缝合部位感染的影响。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;20(8):658-664. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.052. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Principles of confounder selection.混杂因素选择原则。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
7
The Efficacy of Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures for Preventing Incisional Surgical Site Infections in Digestive Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.抗菌缝线预防消化外科切口手术部位感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Oct;22(10):1832-1841. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3832-8. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the incidence of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure in gastroenterological surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial in a single center.三氯生涂层缝线对胃肠外科腹壁闭合术后手术部位感染发生率的影响:一项单中心双盲随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2018 Mar 10. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.12.020.
9
Triclosan-coated sutures and surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: the TRISTAN review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.腹部手术中三氯生涂层缝线与手术部位感染:TRISTAN综述、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1681-0. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.美国疾病预防控制中心 2017 年《手术部位感染预防指南》。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.