• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying.基于姑息治疗的反对安乐死的论据。
Bioethics. 2025 Feb;39(2):187-194. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13352. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
When is hastened death considered suicide? A systematically conducted literature review about palliative care professionals' experiences where assisted dying is legal.加速死亡何时被视为自杀?一项系统的文献综述,涉及姑息治疗专业人员在协助死亡合法的情况下的经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 31;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0451-4.
3
[Palliative medicine and palliative nursing: between nursing care and terminal care. "Certified dying" is not available].[姑息医学与姑息护理:介于护理与临终关怀之间。不存在“认证死亡”]
Pflege Z. 2011 Sep;64(9):518-22.
4
Physician-assisted death with limited access to palliative care.在姑息治疗资源有限的情况下的医生协助死亡。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):652-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101953. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
Religious support for assisted dying: we must not gamble with vulnerable people's lives in changing the law.宗教对安乐死的支持:在修改法律时,我们绝不能拿弱势群体的生命去冒险。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 20;375:n2510. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2510.
6
Should assisted dying be lawful?协助死亡应该合法化吗?
Br J Community Nurs. 2014 Feb;19(2):94, 96-8. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2014.19.2.94.
7
Legalising assisted dying does not affect palliative care, says US expert.美国专家表示,安乐死合法化不会影响姑息治疗。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):993. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.993.
8
The House of Lords Select Committee on the Assisted Dying for the Terminally III Bill: implications for specialist palliative care.上议院关于《晚期绝症患者协助死亡法案》特别委员会:对专科姑息治疗的影响
Palliat Med. 2005 Sep;19(6):444-53. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1062oa.
9
Does legal physician-assisted dying impede development of palliative care? The Belgian and Benelux experience.合法的医生协助死亡是否会阻碍姑息治疗的发展?比利时及比荷卢经济联盟的经验。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):657-60. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102116. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
[Assisted dying, patient autonomy and palliative care: commercial enterprise at the end of life?].[协助死亡、患者自主权与姑息治疗:临终时的商业行为?]
Pflege Z. 2008 Oct;61(10):567-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assisted Suicide for Irreversible Patients on Life Support? The Intricate Italian Journey Towards Conforming with the Legislation of Spain, Austria, and Portugal.为依赖生命维持系统的不可逆患者实施安乐死?意大利迈向符合西班牙、奥地利和葡萄牙立法的复杂历程。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;13(8):885. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080885.

基于姑息治疗的反对安乐死的论据。

Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying.

作者信息

Colburn Ben

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2025 Feb;39(2):187-194. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13352. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13352
PMID:39360468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11754995/
Abstract

Opponents of legalised assisted dying often assert that palliative care is worse in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, and imply that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. This study considers five versions of this claim: that it is difficulty to access expert palliative care in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, that those countries rank low in their quality of end-of-life care; that legalising assisted dying doesn't expand patient choice in respect of palliative care; that growth in palliative care services has stalled in countries where assisted dying has been legalised; and that legalised assisted dying impedes the growth of palliative care or causes it to decline. In each case, it concludes that neither argumentation nor evidence supports these claims.

摘要

反对安乐死合法化的人常常断言,在安乐死已合法化的国家,姑息治疗的情况更糟,并暗示安乐死合法化使姑息治疗变差。本研究考量了这一说法的五个版本:在安乐死已合法化的国家,难以获得专业的姑息治疗;这些国家在临终关怀质量方面排名较低;安乐死合法化并未扩大患者在姑息治疗方面的选择;在安乐死已合法化的国家,姑息治疗服务的增长停滞不前;安乐死合法化阻碍了姑息治疗的发展或导致其衰退。在每种情况下,研究得出的结论都是,无论是论证还是证据都不支持这些说法。