Vergallo Gianluca Montanari, Marinelli Susanna, Di Fazio Nicola, Zaami Simona, Frati Paola
Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
School of Law, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;13(8):885. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080885.
: In 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court (ICC) stated that the principles of equality, dignity, and self-determination enshrined in the constitution require that assisted suicide be considered lawful under certain conditions, including that the patient is kept alive through life-sustaining treatments. In fact, since such patients could already die by refusing treatment, assisted suicide is ethical as it allows them to die more quickly and with dignity. The paper aims to analyze the requirement of life-sustaining treatments from a legal and comparative perspective. : The authors performed the search on Italian legal databases as well as on Scopus and PubMed and by comparing Italian regulations with those of Spain, Portugal, and Austria, which are similar to the Italian one in their fundamentally restrictive nature. The authors have delved into the Italian legal system through an analytical method of interpretation of the normative texts and used the comparative method to investigate which of the legal systems considered is more permissive. : According to the ICC, continuing to prohibit assisted suicide for patients who do not require life-sustaining treatments is not discriminatory: these patients cannot be equated with others, as only in the former case does refusing treatment lead to death. From its personalist ethical framework, the ICC also rejected the claim that the patient's self-determination is being infringed upon: self-determination must be balanced with the protection of life, which is a fundamental value. However, in 2024, the ICC clarified that life-sustaining treatments are not limited to those directly supporting vital functions through medical machines, but also include all treatments without which the person would die in a short time, such as manual bowel evacuation. : The current Italian regulation seems inconsistent. It would be preferable to regulate assisted suicide by referencing the models of Spain, Portugal, and Austria.
2019年,意大利宪法法院(ICC)指出,宪法所规定的平等、尊严和自决原则要求在某些条件下将协助自杀视为合法,包括患者通过维持生命的治疗得以存活。事实上,由于这类患者本可通过拒绝治疗而死亡,协助自杀是合乎伦理的,因为这能让他们更快且有尊严地离世。本文旨在从法律和比较的视角分析维持生命治疗的要求。
作者在意大利法律数据库以及Scopus和PubMed上进行了检索,并将意大利的法规与西班牙、葡萄牙和奥地利的法规进行比较,这几个国家的法规在本质上具有类似的严格限制性质。作者通过对规范性文本的分析性解释方法深入研究了意大利法律体系,并使用比较方法来探究所考虑的法律体系中哪一个更为宽松。
根据意大利宪法法院的说法,继续禁止对不需要维持生命治疗的患者实施协助自杀并不构成歧视:这类患者不能与其他患者等同,因为只有在前一种情况下,拒绝治疗才会导致死亡。从其个人主义伦理框架出发,意大利宪法法院还驳回了关于患者自决权受到侵犯的说法:自决权必须与对生命的保护相平衡,而生命是一项基本价值。然而,在2024年,意大利宪法法院澄清,维持生命的治疗不仅限于通过医疗机器直接支持生命功能的治疗,还包括所有不进行这些治疗患者就会在短时间内死亡的治疗,如手动排便。
意大利目前的法规似乎存在不一致之处。最好参照西班牙、葡萄牙和奥地利的模式来规范协助自杀。