Suppr超能文献

识别可能改善颈动脉狭窄治疗方案选择的患者特征。

Identification of patient characteristics that may improve procedure selection for the treatment of carotid stenosis.

机构信息

Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;111(10). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae227.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are common procedures for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The aim of this study was to identify factors that modify the effect between type of treatment and outcome, and could thus be used to refine the selection of treatment procedure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent either carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting between 2012 and 2018 in German hospitals were included. The analysis of effect modification was focused on baseline patient characteristics. The outcome was a composite of any stroke or death until discharge from hospital. For multivariable analyses, a generalized linear mixed regression model was used.

RESULTS

Some 221 282 patients were included, of whom 68% were male. In patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting, the risk of any stroke or death was 2.3% and 3.7% respectively. Patient age was statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of a composite outcome of any stroke or death (main effect of age: adjusted OR 1.21 (95% c.i. 1.17 to 1.26), P < 0.001). The age effect was stronger in patients treated with carotid artery stenting (interaction effect: adjusted OR 1.29 (95% c.i. 1.20 to 1.38), P < 0.001). Statistically significant interaction effects were identified for side of treatment, ASA grade, contralateral degree of stenosis, and the time interval between the index event and treatment.

CONCLUSION

This analysis shows that carotid artery stenting may be particularly disadvantageous in older patients, in patients with right-sided stenosis, and in symptomatic patients treated within the first 2 days after the index event. In patients with contralateral occlusion, carotid artery stenting appears equivalent to carotid endarterectomy.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常见方法。本研究旨在确定影响治疗方式与结果之间关系的因素,并据此对治疗方案进行选择。

方法

纳入 2012 年至 2018 年期间在德国医院接受颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术的所有患者。对影响因素的分析主要集中在患者基线特征方面。主要转归为出院前任何卒中或死亡的复合终点。多变量分析采用广义线性混合回归模型。

结果

共纳入 221 282 例患者,其中 68%为男性。行颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术的患者中,任何卒中或死亡的风险分别为 2.3%和 3.7%。患者年龄与复合终点(任何卒中或死亡)的风险呈显著正相关(年龄的主要效应:校正后的比值比 1.21(95%置信区间 1.17 至 1.26),P<0.001)。在接受颈动脉支架置入术的患者中,年龄的影响更强(交互效应:校正后的比值比 1.29(95%置信区间 1.20 至 1.38),P<0.001)。治疗侧、ASA 分级、对侧狭窄程度以及首发事件与治疗之间的时间间隔方面存在显著的交互作用。

结论

本分析表明,颈动脉支架置入术可能对年龄较大、右侧狭窄和首发事件后 2 天内治疗的有症状患者不利。在对侧闭塞的患者中,颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术效果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1c/11448336/b33bd485f18b/znae227f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验