Suppr超能文献

美国性少数和跨性别成年人的转变实践回忆与心理健康症状:一项横断面研究。

Conversion practice recall and mental health symptoms in sexual and gender minority adults in the USA: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

The PRIDE Study-PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Anti-Racism and Community Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;11(11):879-889. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00251-7. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conversion practices are associated with psychological morbidity, yet few studies have evaluated differences between efforts to change gender identity, sexual orientation, or both. We aimed to examine the individual and joint association of conversion practice recall targeted at gender identity or sexual orientation, or both, with current mental health symptoms among sexual and gender minority people.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from The PRIDE Study, a US-based, online, prospective cohort study of sexual and gender minority adults who were recruited through social media, digital advertisements, and sexual and gender minority community-based events and organisations. For this analysis, we included participants who completed a lifetime questionnaire in 2019-20 and a subsequent annual questionnaire in 2020-21 without missing outcome data. All questionnaires were in English. The exposure was lifetime recall of conversion practice targeting gender identity alone, sexual orientation alone, or both (versus no conversion practice). Mental health outcomes were continuous measures: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (depression) scale, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 6-item scale, and Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised scale. We used linear regression to analyse the associations of conversion practice recall and mental health symptoms, controlling for demographic and childhood factors and stratified between cisgender and transgender and gender diverse groups. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the potential impact of unmeasured confounding. Analyses were conducted in R. We included people with related lived experience in the design and implementation of this study.

FINDINGS

Of 6601 participants who completed the lifetime questionnaire in 2019-20, 4440 completed the subsequent annual questionnaire in 2020 or 2021, and 4426 did not have missing outcome data. Of the 4426 included participants, 4073 (92·0%) identified as White (either alone or in combination with other ethnoracial options), 460 (10·4%) identified with multiple ethnoracial identities, and 1923 (43·4%) were transgender and gender diverse. Participants' age ranged from 18 years to 84 years (median 31·7 years, IQR 25·5-44·1). 149 (3·4%) participants reported sexual orientation-related conversion practice alone, 43 (1·0%) reported gender identity-related conversion practice alone, and 42 (1·0%) reported both. Recalling both forms of conversion practice was most strongly associated with greater post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; β 2·84, 95% CI 0·94-4·74) and suicidality (2·14, 0·95-3·32) symptoms. Recall of only sexual orientation-related conversion practice was associated with greater symptoms of PTSD (1·10, 0·22-1·98). Recall of gender identity-related conversion practice alone was most strongly associated with greater depressive symptoms (3·24, 1·03-5·46). Only associations for suicidality differed between cisgender and transgender and gender diverse participants, although the latter showed higher mental health symptoms overall. Findings were moderately robust to potential sources of unmeasured confounding in sensitivity analysis.

INTERPRETATION

Recall of conversion practice exposure was associated with a range of mental health symptoms among sexual and gender minority people. These findings support calls to ban conversion practices because of their effects as a structural determinant of mental health.

FUNDING

Gill Foundation, Dona Rockstad, and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

摘要

背景

改变性别认同、性取向或两者的努力与心理病态有关,但很少有研究评估改变性别认同、性取向或两者的努力之间的差异。我们旨在研究针对性别认同或性取向或两者的转换实践回忆与性和性别少数群体人群当前心理健康症状之间的个体和联合关联。

方法

这项横断面研究使用了美国基于网络的前瞻性队列研究“PRIDE 研究”的数据,该研究招募了通过社交媒体、数字广告以及性和性别少数群体社区的活动和组织招募的性和性别少数成年参与者。在这项分析中,我们包括了在 2019-20 年完成了终身问卷且在 2020-21 年没有缺失结果数据的后续年度问卷的参与者。所有问卷均为英文。暴露是针对单一性别认同、单一性取向或两者(而非无转换实践)的转换实践回忆。心理健康结果是连续测量:广泛性焦虑障碍 7 项量表、患者健康问卷 9 项(抑郁)量表、创伤后应激障碍检查表 6 项量表和修订后的自杀行为问卷量表。我们使用线性回归分析转换实践回忆和心理健康症状之间的关联,控制人口统计学和儿童时期因素,并在顺性别者和跨性别者和性别多样化群体之间进行分层。敏感性分析评估了潜在的未测量混杂因素的影响。分析在 R 中进行。我们在设计和实施这项研究中包括了具有相关生活经历的人。

结果

在 2019-20 年完成了终身问卷的 6601 名参与者中,有 4440 名在 2020 年或 2021 年完成了后续年度问卷,且有 4426 名没有缺失结果数据。在纳入的 4426 名参与者中,有 4073 名(92.0%)认定为白人(单独或与其他种族选项结合),460 名(10.4%)认定为多种种族身份,1923 名(43.4%)为跨性别者和性别多样化者。参与者的年龄范围从 18 岁到 84 岁(中位数 31.7 岁,IQR 25.5-44.1)。有 149 名(3.4%)参与者报告了与性取向相关的转换实践,43 名(1.0%)报告了与性别认同相关的转换实践,42 名(1.0%)报告了两者都有。回忆两种形式的转换实践与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD;β 2.84,95%CI 0.94-4.74)和自杀(2.14,0.95-3.32)症状的相关性最强。仅与性取向相关的转换实践回忆与 PTSD 症状(1.10,0.22-1.98)相关。回忆单一性别认同相关的转换实践与抑郁症状(3.24,1.03-5.46)的相关性最强。只有自杀的关联在顺性别者和跨性别者和性别多样化者之间有所不同,尽管后者总体上表现出更高的心理健康症状。在敏感性分析中,发现结果对潜在的未测量混杂因素有一定的稳健性。

解释

转换实践暴露的回忆与性和性别少数群体人群的一系列心理健康症状有关。这些发现支持呼吁禁止转换实践,因为它们是心理健康的结构性决定因素之一。

资金

Gill 基金会、Dona Rockstad 和患者为中心的结果研究所。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验