Smeets Kim, Rohaan Ellen, van der Ven Sanne, Bakx Anouke
Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Stichting BOOM, Oisterwijk, the Netherlands.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Jun;95(2):321-345. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12719. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Teachers' and parents' judgements of pupils' cognitive abilities influence pupils' daily learning opportunities and experiences, as these judgements affect the difficulty level of materials and instruction that teachers and parents provide. Over time, these judgements thus significantly shape educational success. However, pupils' characteristics, such as special educational needs (SEN), giftedness and socioeconomic status (SES) can influence and bias judgement accuracy.
The present study aimed to investigate the relation between pupils' cognitive abilities and their teachers' and parents' judgements of these abilities, and potential bias in these judgements related to SEN, giftedness, and SES.
The sample consisted of 1073 primary school pupils from grades 4-6 from 77 classes in 16 schools, and their teachers and parents.
Teachers and parents rated their pupils' cognitive abilities. Pupils completed the COVAT-3, a cognitive ability test.
Multilevel analyses revealed that parent judgements were significantly higher than teacher judgements, but both informants' judgements were equally strong related to the cognitive ability scores. When controlling for pupils' assessed cognitive abilities, the results revealed small judgement biases: negative for SEN, positive for giftedness, and finally positive for high SES, but only in teachers.
Overall, the results indicated that teachers and parents can judge their pupils abilities to a moderate degree, but they also hold judgement biases related to SEN, giftedness and SES. As these biases can affect pupils' opportunities, it is important to increase teachers' and parents' awareness.
教师和家长对学生认知能力的判断会影响学生日常的学习机会和经历,因为这些判断会影响教师和家长所提供材料及教学的难度水平。随着时间的推移,这些判断会显著影响教育成就。然而,学生的特征,如特殊教育需求(SEN)、天赋和社会经济地位(SES),会影响判断的准确性并产生偏差。
本研究旨在调查学生的认知能力与教师和家长对这些能力的判断之间的关系,以及这些判断中与特殊教育需求、天赋和社会经济地位相关的潜在偏差。
样本包括来自16所学校77个班级的4至6年级的1073名小学生及其教师和家长。
教师和家长对学生的认知能力进行评分。学生完成了认知能力测试COVAT - 3。
多层次分析显示,家长的判断显著高于教师的判断,但两位信息提供者的判断与认知能力得分的相关性同样强烈。在控制学生评估的认知能力后,结果显示出较小的判断偏差:特殊教育需求呈负偏差,天赋呈正偏差,高社会经济地位呈正偏差,但仅在教师中存在。
总体而言,结果表明教师和家长能够在一定程度上判断学生的能力,但他们也存在与特殊教育需求、天赋和社会经济地位相关的判断偏差。由于这些偏差会影响学生的机会,提高教师和家长的意识很重要。