• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHC智力测验的心理测量网络分析:对“超越”广义CHC分数的研究、理论及解释的启示

A Psychometric Network Analysis of CHC Intelligence Measures: Implications for Research, Theory, and Interpretation of Broad CHC Scores "Beyond ".

作者信息

McGrew Kevin S, Schneider W Joel, Decker Scott L, Bulut Okan

机构信息

Institute for Applied Psychometrics, 1313 Pondview Lane E, St. Joseph, MN 56374, USA.

College of Education and Human Development, Temple University, Ritter Hall 358, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2023 Jan 16;11(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010019.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence11010019
PMID:36662149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9865475/
Abstract

For over a century, the structure of intelligence has been dominated by factor analytic methods that presume tests are indicators of latent entities (e.g., general intelligence or ). Recently, psychometric network methods and theories (e.g., process overlap theory; dynamic mutualism) have provided alternatives to -centric factor models. However, few studies have investigated contemporary cognitive measures using network methods. We apply a Gaussian graphical network model to the age 9-19 standardization sample of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Fourth Edition. Results support the primary broad abilities from the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory and suggest that the working memory-attentional control complex may be central to understanding a CHC network model of intelligence. Supplementary multidimensional scaling analyses indicate the existence of possible higher-order dimensions (PPIK; triadic theory; System I-II cognitive processing) as well as separate learning and retrieval aspects of long-term memory. Overall, the network approach offers a viable alternative to factor models with a -centric bias (i.e., bifactor models) that have led to erroneous conclusions regarding the utility of broad CHC scores in test interpretation beyond the full-scale IQ, .

摘要

一个多世纪以来,智力结构一直由因素分析方法主导,这些方法假定测试是潜在实体(例如,一般智力等)的指标。最近,心理测量网络方法和理论(例如,过程重叠理论;动态共生理论)为以因素为中心的模型提供了替代方案。然而,很少有研究使用网络方法来研究当代认知测量。我们将高斯图形网络模型应用于伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验第四版9至19岁的标准化样本。结果支持了卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔(CHC)理论中的主要宽泛能力,并表明工作记忆-注意力控制复合体可能是理解CHC智力网络模型的核心。补充性多维尺度分析表明可能存在高阶维度(PPIK;三元理论;系统I-II认知加工)以及长期记忆中单独的学习和检索方面。总体而言,网络方法为具有以因素为中心偏差的因素模型(即双因素模型)提供了一种可行的替代方案,这些因素模型在超出全量表智商的测试解释中,就宽泛的CHC分数的效用得出了错误结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/e9fb3733fad8/jintelligence-11-00019-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/cc7bc08585e5/jintelligence-11-00019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/483fcbcf3a71/jintelligence-11-00019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/cb3f7655ed8e/jintelligence-11-00019-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/e9fb3733fad8/jintelligence-11-00019-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/cc7bc08585e5/jintelligence-11-00019-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/483fcbcf3a71/jintelligence-11-00019-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/cb3f7655ed8e/jintelligence-11-00019-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ad/9865475/e9fb3733fad8/jintelligence-11-00019-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Psychometric Network Analysis of CHC Intelligence Measures: Implications for Research, Theory, and Interpretation of Broad CHC Scores "Beyond ".CHC智力测验的心理测量网络分析:对“超越”广义CHC分数的研究、理论及解释的启示
J Intell. 2023 Jan 16;11(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010019.
2
Monte Carlo Modeling of Contemporary Intelligence Test (IQ) Factor Structure: Implications for IQ Assessment, Interpretation, and Theory.当代智力测验(IQ)因子结构的蒙特卡罗建模:对 IQ 评估、解释和理论的影响。
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):977-993. doi: 10.1177/1073191119869828. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Carroll's Three-Stratum (3S) Cognitive Ability Theory at 30 Years: Impact, 3S-CHC Theory Clarification, Structural Replication, and Cognitive-Achievement Psychometric Network Analysis Extension.卡罗尔三层次(3S)认知能力理论30年回顾:影响、3S-CHC理论阐释、结构复制及认知成就心理测量网络分析扩展
J Intell. 2023 Feb 6;11(2):32. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11020032.
4
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth UK Edition with a referred Irish sample: Wechsler and Cattell-Horn-Carroll model comparisons with 15 subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版英国修订版在爱尔兰转诊样本中的结构效度:韦氏与卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔模型对15个分测验的比较
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Sep;87(3):383-407. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12155. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
5
Predictive Value of Traditional Measures of Executive Function on Broad Abilities of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities.传统执行功能测量指标对卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔认知能力理论的广泛能力的预测价值。
Assessment. 2019 Oct;26(7):1375-1385. doi: 10.1177/1073191117731814. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Comparing Cattell-Horn-Carroll factor models: differences between bifactor and higher order factor models in predicting language achievement.比较 Cattell-Horn-Carroll 因素模型:双因素和高阶因素模型在预测语言成绩方面的差异。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):789-805. doi: 10.1037/a0036745. Epub 2014 May 19.
7
Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-horn-Carroll theory.卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔理论的学业成就与广泛能力关系的元分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Dec;71:42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Woodcock-Johnson-III, Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT), Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC), and Differential Ability Scales (DAS) support Carroll but not Cattell-Horn.伍德科克-约翰逊第三版、考夫曼青少年与成人智力量表(KAIT)、考夫曼儿童成套评估测验(KABC)以及差异能力量表(DAS)支持卡罗尔的理论,但不支持卡特尔-霍恩的理论。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):1001-1015. doi: 10.1037/pas0000389. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Executive functions and intelligence from the CHC theory perspective: Investigating the correspondence between the WAIS-IV and the NAB Executive Functions Module.从 CHC 理论角度看执行功能和智力:考察 WAIS-IV 与 NAB 执行功能模块的对应关系。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr;42(3):240-250. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1705250. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
Age and Sex Invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities: Evidence from Psychometric Network Modeling.《伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验第四版的年龄与性别不变性:来自心理测量网络建模的证据》
J Intell. 2021 Jul 7;9(3):35. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9030035.

引用本文的文献

1
Creativity supports learning through associative thinking.创造力通过联想思维支持学习。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 1;10(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00334-1.
2
The effects of special educational needs and socioeconomic status on teachers' and parents' judgements of pupils' cognitive abilities.特殊教育需求和社会经济地位对教师及家长判断学生认知能力的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Jun;95(2):321-345. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12719. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Assessment of Human Intelligence-The State of the Art in the 2020s.人类智力评估——21世纪20年代的最新进展

本文引用的文献

1
Dual discrepancy/consistency pattern of strengths and weaknesses method of specific learning disability identification: Classification accuracy when combining clinical judgment with assessment data.双重不相符/一致模式的优势和弱势方法在特定学习障碍识别中的应用:将临床判断与评估数据相结合时的分类准确性。
J Sch Psychol. 2022 Jun;92:33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
The network structure of cognitive deficits in first episode psychosis patients.首发精神病患者认知缺陷的网络结构。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jun;244:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice.
J Intell. 2024 Jul 27;12(8):72. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12080072.
4
Intelligence Assessment of Children & Youth Benefiting from Psychological-Educational Support System in Poland.波兰儿童和青少年受益于心理教育支持系统的智力评估。
Sci Data. 2024 Jul 27;11(1):826. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03663-9.
5
Why Do Bi-Factor Models Outperform Higher-Order Factor Models? A Network Perspective.为什么双因素模型优于高阶因素模型?基于网络视角的探讨。
J Intell. 2024 Feb 4;12(2):18. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020018.
6
WISC-V Measurement Invariance According to Sex and Age: Advancing the Understanding of Intergroup Differences in Cognitive Performance.基于性别和年龄的韦氏儿童智力量表第五版测量不变性:深化对认知表现中群体间差异的理解
J Intell. 2023 Sep 6;11(9):180. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11090180.
7
Investigating the Structure of the French WISC-V (WISC-V) for Five Age Groups Using Psychometric Network Modeling.使用心理测量网络模型研究法国版韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在五个年龄组中的结构。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 10;11(8):160. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080160.
8
Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis of the WISC-V with a Clinical Sample.对临床样本进行的韦氏儿童智力量表第五版的自助探索性图表分析
J Intell. 2023 Jul 10;11(7):137. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070137.
9
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.现代智力评估必须公平公正。
J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.
10
The Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia.认知测试在诵读困难评估中的应用。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 26;11(5):79. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050079.
精神病理学网络:理论、方法与实践。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Feb;149:104011. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.104011. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Intelligence Can Be Used to Make a More Equitable Society but Only When Properly Defined and Applied.智慧能够用来创造一个更加公平的社会,但前提是要得到恰当的定义和应用。
J Intell. 2021 Nov 25;9(4):57. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9040057.
5
Which estimation method to choose in network psychometrics? Deriving guidelines for applied researchers.在网络心理测量学中应选择哪种估计方法?为应用研究人员制定指导方针。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):925-946. doi: 10.1037/met0000439. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Intervening on psychopathology networks: Evaluating intervention targets through simulations.干预精神病理学网络:通过模拟评估干预靶点。
Methods. 2022 Aug;204:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Modeling psychopathology: From data models to formal theories.建模精神病理学:从数据模型到形式理论。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Dec;27(6):930-957. doi: 10.1037/met0000303. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
8
Out of bounds? The boundary specification problem for centrality in psychological networks.越界了?心理网络中心性的边界规范问题。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Feb;28(1):179-188. doi: 10.1037/met0000426. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
The Simple View of Reading in Children Acquiring a Regular Orthography (Italian): A Network Analysis Approach.儿童习得正字法(意大利语)中的阅读简易观:一种网络分析方法
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 2;12:686914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686914. eCollection 2021.
10
Individual Differences in Attention and Intelligence: A United Cognitive/Psychometric Approach.注意力与智力的个体差异:一种统一的认知/心理测量方法。
J Intell. 2021 Jul 2;9(3):34. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9030034.