Sigström Robert, Göteson Andreas, Joas Erik, Pålsson Erik, Liberg Benny, Nordenskjöld Axel, Blennow Kaj, Zetterberg Henrik, Landén Mikael
Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Affective Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1601-1609. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02774-4. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Despite electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) being recognized as an effective treatment for major depressive episodes (MDE), its application is subject to controversy due to concerns over cognitive side effects. The pathophysiology of these side effects is not well understood. Here, we examined the effects of ECT on blood-based biomarkers of neuronal injury and astrocytic reactivity. Participants with a major depressive episode (N = 99) underwent acute ECT. Blood was sampled just before (T0) and 30 min after (T1) the first ECT session, as well as just before the sixth session (T2; 48-72 h after the fifth session). Age- and sex-matched controls (N = 99) were recruited from the general population. Serum concentrations of neurofilament light chain (NfL), total tau protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were measured with ultrasensitive single-molecule array assays. Utilizing generalized least squares regression, we compared baseline (T0) biomarker concentrations against those of our control group, and calculated the shifts in serum biomarker concentrations from baseline to immediately post-first ECT session (T1), and prior to the sixth session (T2). Baseline analysis revealed that serum levels of NfL (p < 0.001) and tau (p = 0.036) were significantly elevated in ECT recipients compared with controls, whereas GFAP levels showed no significant difference. Relative to T0, serum NfL concentration neither changed at T1 (mean change 3.1%, 95%CI -0.5% to 6.7%, p = 0.088) nor at T2 (mean change -3.2%, 95%CI -7.6% to 1.5%, p = 0.18). Similarly, no change in total tau was observed (mean change 3.7%, 95%CI -11.6% to 21.7%, p = 0.65). GFAP increased from T0 to T1 (mean change 20.3%, 95%CI 14.6 to 26.3%, p < 0.001), but not from T0 to T2 (mean change -0.7%, 95%CI -5.8% to 4.8%, p = 0.82). In conclusion, our findings suggest that ECT induces a temporary increase in serum GFAP, possibly reflecting transient astrocytic activation. Importantly, we observed no indicators of neuronal damage or long-term elevation in any assessed biomarker.
尽管电休克疗法(ECT)被认为是治疗重度抑郁发作(MDE)的有效方法,但其应用因对认知副作用的担忧而存在争议。这些副作用的病理生理学尚未完全了解。在此,我们研究了ECT对基于血液的神经元损伤和星形胶质细胞反应性生物标志物的影响。患有重度抑郁发作的参与者(N = 99)接受了急性ECT治疗。在第一次ECT治疗前(T0)和治疗后30分钟(T1)采集血液样本,以及在第六次治疗前(T2;第五次治疗后48 - 72小时)采集血液样本。从普通人群中招募年龄和性别匹配的对照组(N = 99)。使用超灵敏单分子阵列分析法测量血清神经丝轻链(NfL)、总tau蛋白和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的浓度。利用广义最小二乘法回归,我们将基线(T0)生物标志物浓度与对照组的浓度进行比较,并计算血清生物标志物浓度从基线到第一次ECT治疗后即刻(T1)以及第六次治疗前(T2)的变化。基线分析显示,与对照组相比,ECT接受者的血清NfL水平(p < 0.001)和tau水平(p = 0.036)显著升高,而GFAP水平无显著差异。相对于T0,血清NfL浓度在T1时未发生变化(平均变化3.1%,95%CI -0.5%至6.7%,p = 0.088),在T2时也未发生变化(平均变化 -3.2%,95%CI -7.6%至1.5%,p = 0.18)。同样,总tau也未观察到变化(平均变化3.7%,95%CI -11.6%至21.7%,p = 0.65)。GFAP从T0到T1升高(平均变化20.3%,95%CI 14.6至26.3%,p < 0.001),但从T0到T2未升高(平均变化 -0.7%,95%CI -5.8%至4.8%,p = 0.82)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,ECT可导致血清GFAP暂时升高,这可能反映了短暂的星形胶质细胞激活。重要的是,我们在任何评估的生物标志物中均未观察到神经元损伤或长期升高的指标。