Suppr超能文献

评估多组分生活方式治疗方案与心理疗法治疗心境障碍(HARMON-E)的有效性:一项随机非劣效性试验方案。

Evaluating the effectiveness of a multi-component lifestyle therapy program versus psychological therapy for managing mood disorders (HARMON-E): protocol of a randomised non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06098-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mood disorders, including unipolar and bipolar depression, contribute significantly to the global burden of disease. Psychological therapy is considered a gold standard non-pharmacological treatment for managing these conditions; however, a growing body of evidence also supports the use of lifestyle therapies for these conditions. Despite some clinical guidelines endorsing the application of lifestyle therapies as a first-line treatment for individuals with mood disorders, there is limited evidence that this recommendation has been widely adopted into routine practice. A key obstacle is the insufficient evidence on whether lifestyle therapies match the clinical and cost effectiveness of psychological therapy, particularly for treating those with moderate to severe symptoms. The HARMON-E Trial seeks to address this gap by conducting a non-inferiority trial evaluating whether a multi-component lifestyle therapy program is non-inferior to psychological therapy on clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes over 8-weeks for adults with major depressive disorder and bipolar affective disorder.

METHODS

This trial uses an individually randomised group treatment design with computer generated block randomisation (1:1). Three hundred and seventy-eight adults with clinical depression or bipolar affective disorder, a recent major depressive episode, and moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms are randomised to receive either lifestyle therapy or psychological therapy (adjunctive to any existing treatments, including pharmacotherapies). Both therapy programs are delivered remotely, via a secure online video conferencing platform. The programs comprise an individual session and six subsequent group-based sessions over 8-weeks. All program aspects (e.g. session duration, time of day, and communications between participants and facilitators) are matched except for the content and program facilitators. Lifestyle therapy is provided by a dietitian and exercise physiologist focusing on four pillars of lifestyle (diet, physical activity, sleep, and substance use), and the psychological therapy program is provided by two psychologists using a cognitive behavioural therapy approach. Data collection occurs at baseline, 8-weeks, 16-weeks, and 6 months with research assistants blinded to allocation. The primary outcome is depressive symptoms at 8 weeks, measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (minimal clinically important difference = 1.6). A pre-specified within-trial economic evaluation will also be conducted.

DISCUSSION

Should lifestyle therapy be found to be as clinically and cost effective as psychological therapy for managing mood disorders, this approach has potential to be considered as an adjunctive treatment for those with moderate to severe depressive symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN12622001026718, registered 22nd July 2022.

PROTOCOL VERSION

4.14, 26/06/2024.

摘要

背景

情绪障碍,包括单相和双相抑郁,对全球疾病负担有重大影响。心理治疗被认为是管理这些疾病的非药物治疗的金标准;然而,越来越多的证据也支持将生活方式疗法用于这些疾病。尽管一些临床指南支持将生活方式疗法作为情绪障碍患者的一线治疗,但很少有证据表明这一建议已广泛应用于常规实践。一个关键障碍是,关于生活方式疗法是否与心理治疗的临床和成本效益相匹配的证据不足,特别是对于治疗那些有中度至重度症状的患者。HARMON-E 试验旨在通过进行一项非劣效性试验来解决这一差距,该试验评估了多组分生活方式治疗方案在 8 周内对成人重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍的临床和成本效益结果是否不劣于心理治疗。

方法

本试验采用个体随机分组治疗设计,采用计算机生成的区组随机化(1:1)。378 名有临床抑郁症或双相情感障碍、近期重度抑郁发作和中重度抑郁症状的成年人被随机分配接受生活方式治疗或心理治疗(附加于任何现有治疗,包括药物治疗)。两种治疗方案均通过安全的在线视频会议平台远程提供。方案包括 8 周内的一次个体会议和六次后续小组会议。除了内容和方案的促进者外,所有方案方面(例如会议持续时间、一天中的时间和参与者与促进者之间的沟通)都匹配。生活方式治疗由营养师和运动生理学家提供,重点关注生活方式的四个支柱(饮食、身体活动、睡眠和物质使用),而心理治疗方案由两名心理学家使用认知行为疗法提供。研究助理对分配情况不知情,在基线、8 周、16 周和 6 个月时进行数据收集。主要结局是 8 周时的抑郁症状,使用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)测量(最小临床重要差异=1.6)。还将进行预先规定的试验内经济评估。

讨论

如果生活方式治疗在管理情绪障碍方面被发现与心理治疗一样具有临床和成本效益,那么这种方法有可能被考虑作为对那些有中度至重度抑郁症状的人的辅助治疗。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册(ANZCTR):ACTRN12622001026718,于 2022 年 7 月 22 日注册。

方案版本

4.14,2024 年 6 月 26 日。

相似文献

2
Psychological therapies for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 14;5(5):CD010558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010558.pub2.
6
Acupuncture for depression.针灸治疗抑郁症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 4;3(3):CD004046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004046.pub4.

本文引用的文献

4
Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value.量化精神障碍的全球负担及其经济价值。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 28;54:101675. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101675. eCollection 2022 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验