Suppr超能文献

氨基糖苷类药物限制期间的抗生素耐药模式。

Antibiotic resistance patterns during aminoglycoside restriction.

作者信息

Young E J, Sewell C M, Koza M A, Clarridge J E

出版信息

Am J Med Sci. 1985 Dec;290(6):223-7. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198512000-00001.

Abstract

When amikacin first became available its use was restricted to prevent the emergence of resistant strains of gram-negative bacilli to this new agent. Gentamicin was the aminoglycoside most widely used at this time, and the incidence of gentamicin-resistant bacteria was 14%, while only 2.4% were resistant to amikacin. For a period of 15 months gentamicin use was restricted, and amikacin was used almost exclusively. Amikacin use was associated with a fall in the incidence of gentamicin-resistant bacteria to 9.2% (p less than .00005), while amikacin resistance remained unchanged at 2.2% (NS). During a period of 21 months after all aminoglycoside restrictions were lifted, gentamicin use again increased, and was accompanied by a return of gentamicin resistance to the baseline level of 15.3%. During this period, amikacin resistance also increased to 4.0% (p less than .0000001) but was due primarily to an increase in resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated gram-negative bacillus during all three periods, and it remained sensitive to both antibiotics regardless of the drug in use. In contrast, P. aeruginosa showed a high level of resistance to gentamicin, which fell when this antibiotic was restricted, only to return to a high level with reinstitution of gentamicin. While there was also an increase in amikacin resistant strains of P. aeruginosa with unrestricted aminoglycoside use, there was no apparent shift in the pattern of aminoglycoside modifying enzymes among a small random selection of amikacin-resistant bacteria. Impaired uptake of antibiotic was the predominant mechanism responsible for P. aeruginosa resistance among strains that did not produce aminoglycoside acetyltransferase (AAC)(6').

摘要

当阿米卡星首次问世时,其使用被限制以防止革兰氏阴性杆菌对这种新药物产生耐药菌株。庆大霉素是当时使用最广泛的氨基糖苷类药物,耐庆大霉素细菌的发生率为14%,而仅对阿米卡星的耐药率仅为2.4%。在15个月的时间里,庆大霉素的使用受到限制,几乎仅使用阿米卡星。使用阿米卡星与耐庆大霉素细菌的发生率降至9.2%相关(p小于0.00005),而阿米卡星耐药率保持在2.2%不变(无显著性差异)。在所有氨基糖苷类药物限制解除后的21个月期间,庆大霉素的使用再次增加,并伴随着庆大霉素耐药率回升至基线水平15.3%。在此期间,阿米卡星耐药率也升至4.0%(p小于0.0000001),但主要是由于耐阿米卡星铜绿假单胞菌的增加。在所有三个时期,大肠埃希菌是最常分离出的革兰氏阴性杆菌,无论使用何种药物,它对两种抗生素均保持敏感。相比之下,铜绿假单胞菌对庆大霉素表现出高耐药性,当这种抗生素受到限制时耐药率下降,但随着庆大霉素重新使用又回升至高水平。虽然在氨基糖苷类药物使用不受限制的情况下,耐阿米卡星的铜绿假单胞菌菌株也有所增加,但在一小部分随机选择的耐阿米卡星细菌中,氨基糖苷类修饰酶的模式没有明显变化。在不产生氨基糖苷乙酰转移酶(AAC)(6')的菌株中,抗生素摄取受损是导致铜绿假单胞菌耐药的主要机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验