Noonan Curtis W, Walker Ethan S, Semmens Erin O, Belcourt Annie, Boulafentis Johna, Garcia Crissy, Graham Jon, Hoskie Nolan, Quintana Eugenia, Simpson Julie, Smith Paul, Teasley Howard L, Ware Desirae, Weiler Emily, Ward Tony J
Center for Population Health Research, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
School of Public and Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Air Qual Atmos Health. 2024 May;17(5):967-978. doi: 10.1007/s11869-023-01492-0. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
Residential wood burning has both practical and traditional value among many indigenous communities of the United States Mountain West, although household biomass burning also results in emissions that are harmful to health. In a household-level three-arm placebo-controlled randomized trial we tested the efficacy of portable filtration units and education interventions on improving pulmonary function and blood pressure measures among elder participants that use wood stoves for residential heating. A total of 143 participants were assigned to the Education (n=49), Filter (n=47), and Control (n=47) arms. Blood pressure and spirometry measures were collected multiple times during a per-intervention winter period and during a follow-up post-intervention winter period. Despite strong PM exposure reduction results with the Filter arm (50% lower compared to Control arm), neither this intervention nor the Education intervention translated to improvements in the selected health measures among this population with a mixture of chronic conditions. Intention to treat analysis failed to demonstrate evidence that either of the intervention arms had beneficial effects on the blood pressure or the spirometry measures. Post-hoc evaluation of effect modification for blood pressure and spirometry outcomes did not reveal any interaction influence on the outcomes according to sex, residential smoking, chronic disease history and study area.
在美国西部山区的许多原住民社区,家用木材燃烧既有实际价值,也有传统价值,尽管家庭生物质燃烧也会产生有害健康的排放物。在一项家庭层面的三臂安慰剂对照随机试验中,我们测试了便携式过滤装置和教育干预措施对改善使用木炉取暖的老年参与者肺功能和血压指标的效果。共有143名参与者被分配到教育组(n = 49)、过滤组(n = 47)和对照组(n = 47)。在干预期间的一个冬季以及干预后的随访冬季,多次收集血压和肺活量测定指标。尽管过滤组在降低颗粒物暴露方面效果显著(与对照组相比降低了50%),但在患有多种慢性病的人群中,无论是这种干预措施还是教育干预措施,都未能转化为所选健康指标的改善。意向性分析未能证明任何一个干预组对血压或肺活量测定指标有有益影响。对血压和肺活量测定结果的效应修正进行的事后评估未发现根据性别、居住环境吸烟情况、慢性病病史和研究区域对结果有任何交互影响。