Markman Timothy M, Xu Lingyu, Zahid Sohail, Patel Darshak, Marchlinski Francis E, Callans David, Nazarian Saman
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;10(12):2635-2643. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Atrial conduction velocity (CV) is influenced by autonomic tone and contributes to the pathophysiology of re-entrant arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation. Cardiac sympathetic nerve activation has been reported via electrical stimulation within the vertebral vein (VV).
This study sought to characterize changes in right atrial (RA) CV associated with sympathetic stimulation from pharmacologic (isoproterenol) or direct electrical (VV stimulation) approaches.
Subjects undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation had baseline RA electroanatomic maps performed in sinus rhythm (SR). RA mapping was repeated during right VV stimulation (20 Hz; up to 20 mA) and again with both RA pacing and during isoproterenol infusion, each titrated to the heart rate achieved with VV stimulation.
A total of 100 RA maps were analyzed from 25 subjects (mean age: 58 ± 14 years; 56% male), and CV was calculated from 51,534 electroanatomic map points. VV stimulation increased heart rate from baseline in all subjects (22.5 ± 5.5 beats/min). The average CV increased with VV stimulation (82.0 ± 34.5 cm/s) or isoproterenol (83.7 ± 35.0 cm/s) when compared to SR (70.8 ± 32.5 cm/s; P < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CV decreased with VV stimulation or isoproterenol when compared to SR (coefficient of variation: 0.33 ± 0.21 vs 0.35 ± 0.23 vs 0.57 ± 0.29; P < 0.001). There was no difference in CV or CV heterogeneity between SR and RA pacing, suggesting that these changes were independent of heart rate.
Global RA CV is enhanced, and heterogeneity of CV is reduced, with either pharmacologic or direct electrical sympathetic stimulation via the right VV.
心房传导速度(CV)受自主神经张力影响,并参与折返性心律失常和心房颤动的病理生理过程。已有报道通过刺激椎静脉(VV)内的神经可激活心脏交感神经。
本研究旨在描述与药理学(异丙肾上腺素)或直接电刺激(VV刺激)交感神经相关的右心房(RA)CV变化特征。
接受心房颤动导管消融术的受试者在窦性心律(SR)下进行基线RA电解剖标测。在右VV刺激(20Hz;最高20mA)期间重复RA标测,并在RA起搏和异丙肾上腺素输注期间再次进行标测,每次均将心率调整至VV刺激时达到的心率。
共分析了25名受试者(平均年龄:58±14岁;56%为男性)的100幅RA标测图,并从51534个电解剖标测点计算CV。VV刺激使所有受试者的心率均高于基线水平(22.5±5.5次/分钟)。与SR(70.8±32.5cm/s)相比,VV刺激(82.0±34.5cm/s)或异丙肾上腺素(83.7±35.0cm/s)时平均CV增加(P<0.001)。与SR相比,VV刺激或异丙肾上腺素使CV的异质性降低(变异系数:0.33±0.21对0.35±0.23对0.57±0.29;P<0.001)。SR和RA起搏之间的CV或CV异质性无差异,表明这些变化与心率无关。
通过右VV进行药理学或直接电交感神经刺激可增强整体RA CV并降低CV的异质性。