Markman Timothy M, Tschabrunn Cory M, Callans David, Marchlinski Francis E, Nazarian Saman
Section for Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;10(3):207-213. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4447.
Infrequent intraprocedural premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) limit the efficacy of catheter ablation. Intravascular stimulation of sympathetic nerves via vertebral veins (VVs) has been used to activate cardiac sympathetic tone and may promote PVCs.
To characterize the ability of direct electrical sympathetic stimulation via VVs to induce PVCs at the time of catheter ablation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective case series involved adult patients undergoing catheter ablation of PVCs, with rare or absent PVCs despite standard provocation, at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2022 and 2024. Stimulation was performed via the left VV (20 Hz, up to 25 mA).
The primary outcome was PVC frequency, assessed before, during, and after stimulation. A multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression was used to compare the rate of PVCs during the procedure.
Fifteen patients (mean [SD] age, 60 [17] years; 10 male [71%]) had a mean (SD) preprocedure PVC burden of 16.3% (8.6%) (median [IQR], 17.0% [11.5%-21.5%]), and 7 of 15 had undergone at least 1 prior unsuccessful ablation. Provocation of PVCs was attempted with isoproterenol, atrial and ventricular burst pacing, and minimal sedation in all patients before VV stimulation. Throughout the 10-minute period before VV stimulation, patients had a mean (SD) of 1.3 (1.4) PVCs (median [IQR], 1.0 [0.0-2.5] PVCs). During VV stimulation, PVCs were noted in all patients (mean [SD], 8.2 [5.7] PVCs per minute; median [IQR], 6.0 [4.5-13.0] PVCs per minute). In the 10-minute period after VV stimulation, patients had a mean (SD) of 5.1 (6.6) PVCs per minute (median [IQR], 3.0 [0.5-6.5] PVCs per minute). After VV stimulation, ablation was guided by activation mapping in 7 patients and by pace mapping alone in the remaining patients. Postablation monitoring demonstrated a mean (SD) 1.3% (2.3%) burden of PVCs (median [IQR], 0.0% [0.0%-2.5%]), with 9 of 15 patients having less than 1% burden of PVCs. There were no adverse events related to VV stimulation.
These findings suggest that intravascular sympathetic stimulation via the VV can be used to safely provoke PVCs during catheter ablation.
术中频发室性早搏(PVC)会限制导管消融的疗效。通过椎静脉(VV)对交感神经进行血管内刺激已被用于激活心脏交感神经张力,并可能促进PVC的发生。
明确在导管消融时通过VV进行直接电交感神经刺激诱发PVC的能力。
设计、背景和参与者:这项前瞻性病例系列研究纳入了2022年至2024年在宾夕法尼亚大学医院接受PVC导管消融的成年患者,尽管进行了标准激发试验,但PVC仍很少见或未出现。通过左VV进行刺激(20Hz,最高25mA)。
主要结局是PVC频率,在刺激前、刺激期间和刺激后进行评估。采用多级混合效应泊松回归比较术中PVC的发生率。
15例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,60[17]岁;10例男性[71%])术前PVC平均负担为16.3%(8.6%)(中位数[四分位间距],17.0%[11.5%-21.5%]),15例中有7例曾至少经历过1次消融失败。在所有患者中,在VV刺激前尝试使用异丙肾上腺素、心房和心室超速起搏以及最小镇静来激发PVC。在VV刺激前的10分钟内,患者平均(标准差)有1.3(1.4)次PVC(中位数[四分位间距],1.0[0.0-2.5]次PVC)。在VV刺激期间,所有患者均出现PVC(平均[标准差],每分钟8.2[5.7]次PVC;中位数[四分位间距],每分钟6.0[4.5-13.0]次PVC)。在VV刺激后的10分钟内,患者平均(标准差)每分钟有5.1(6.6)次PVC(中位数[四分位间距],每分钟3.0[0.5-6.5]次PVC)。VV刺激后,7例患者通过激动标测指导消融,其余患者仅通过起搏标测指导消融。消融后监测显示PVC平均负担为1.3%(2.3%)(中位数[四分位间距],0.0%[0.0%-2.5%]),15例中有9例患者PVC负担小于1%。没有与VV刺激相关的不良事件。
这些发现表明,在导管消融过程中,通过VV进行血管内交感神经刺激可安全地诱发PVC。