Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Oct 4;28(10):566. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05932-8.
This study compares the efficacy of oral exercise alone to oral exercise with frenectomy in improving obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) symptoms and quality of life (QOL) in patients with ankyloglossia.
A prospective, controlled, double-blind clinical study enrolled fifteen adults (20-60 years) newly diagnosed with mild to moderate OSA and ankyloglossia. Participants were randomly assigned to either oral exercise alone (control group; n = 8) or oral exercise with frenectomy (intervention group; n = 7). Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month therapy period using polysomnography, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), tongue strength (measured in kPa), and QOL questionnaires.
Both control (-2.88 ± 1.73; p = 0.02) and intervention (-4.00 ± 3.65; p = 0.03) groups showed a significant reduction in ESS scores, indicating both improved sleepiness. Although the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) increased in both groups after treatment, these changes were not statistically significant (control 4.73 ± 15.55; p = 0.48, intervention 10.42 ± 14.66; p = 0.12). Tongue strength significantly increased in both groups: control group (p = 0.04) and intervention group (p = 0.03). Satisfaction rates with the overall treatment process were 100% in the control group and 57.1% in the intervention group. Furthermore, 75.0% and 57.1% of participants in the respective groups reported an improvement in QOL.
Frenectomy improved tongue mobility and the ability to perform oral exercises in individuals with OSA and ankyloglossia. However, these exercises did not significantly improve OSA-related symptoms or QOL.
While frenectomy enhances tongue mobility, thereby enabling better engagement in oral exercises. These exercises alone did not significantly improve OSA-related symptoms or QOL. This suggests that oral exercises focusing solely on tongue mobility may not be sufficient for managing OSA.
The Thai Clinical Trials Registry was TCTR20220429002.
本研究比较了单纯口腔运动与舌系带切开术联合口腔运动对舌系带过紧患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)症状和生活质量(QOL)的改善效果。
前瞻性、对照、双盲临床研究纳入了 15 名(20-60 岁)新诊断为轻至中度 OSA 和舌系带过紧的成年人。参与者随机分配至单纯口腔运动组(对照组;n=8)或口腔运动联合舌系带切开术组(干预组;n=7)。在 3 个月的治疗期后,使用多导睡眠图、Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)、舌力(以千帕为单位)和 QOL 问卷评估结果。
对照组(-2.88±1.73;p=0.02)和干预组(-4.00±3.65;p=0.03)的 ESS 评分均显著降低,表明两组患者的嗜睡症状均有所改善。尽管两组治疗后呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)均增加,但这些变化无统计学意义(对照组 4.73±15.55;p=0.48,干预组 10.42±14.66;p=0.12)。两组舌力均显著增加:对照组(p=0.04)和干预组(p=0.03)。对照组的总体治疗过程满意度为 100%,干预组为 57.1%。此外,分别有 75.0%和 57.1%的组内参与者报告 QOL 得到改善。
舌系带切开术提高了 OSA 伴舌系带过紧患者的舌活动度和进行口腔运动的能力。然而,这些运动并未显著改善与 OSA 相关的症状或 QOL。
虽然舌系带切开术增强了舌的活动度,从而使患者能够更好地进行口腔运动,但这些运动本身并不能显著改善与 OSA 相关的症状或 QOL。这表明仅针对舌活动度的口腔运动可能不足以治疗 OSA。
泰国临床试验注册中心,TCTR20220429002。