Lin Alice J, Ferris Laura K, Maier John, Maier Robin
From the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
South Med J. 2024 Oct;117(10):609-611. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001739.
Physicians other than dermatologists evaluate nearly 60% of all skin diseases, and 22% of these physicians are family physicians. Dermatology education is therefore an important aspect of Family Medicine training. Dermatologic procedural training in Family Medicine residency is not standardized, however, so family physicians graduate with highly variable skills. This study describes the scope and diagnostic outcomes of skin biopsies performed by residents at a multisite Family Medicine residency network in comparison with those performed by attendings at a Family Medicine faculty community practice.
We performed a retrospective chart review of patients evaluated at eight Family Medicine residency training sites and one Family Medicine faculty community practice within a regional academic health system between January 2020 and October 2022. Patients with a skin finding who underwent at least one skin biopsy during their visit were included in the study.
Among all of the skin findings, the incidence of skin biopsy was 3.6% (258/7104) for residents and 1.8% (175/9917) for attendings ( < 0.001). Family Medicine residents performed fewer shave biopsies (57.8% vs 77.7%, < 0.001) and more punch biopsies (25.6% vs 11.4%, < 0.001) compared with attendings. Most biopsies performed by residents and attendings were benign, although residents biopsied significantly more benign (79.1% vs 64.6%, < 0.001) and malignant lesions (11.2% vs 5.7%, = 0.049). Attendings biopsied significantly more low-to-moderate-grade dysplastic (22.3% vs 5.0%, < 0.001) and high-grade atypical lesions (4.0% vs 0.8%, = 0.034).
Family Medicine residents at this residency network receive training in a variety of skin biopsy types. Distinct skin biopsy practices and outcomes between residents and attendings may reflect differences in patient populations, clinical expertise, and dermatology referral patterns.
除皮肤科医生外,还有近 60%的医生会评估所有皮肤病,其中 22%的医生为家庭医生。因此,皮肤科教育是家庭医学培训的一个重要方面。然而,家庭医学住院医师的皮肤科操作培训尚未标准化,因此家庭医生毕业时的技能水平差异很大。本研究描述了一个多站点家庭医学住院医师网络中的住院医师与一个家庭医学教师社区实践中的主治医生进行的皮肤活检的范围和诊断结果。
我们对 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间在一个区域性学术医疗系统内的 8 个家庭医学住院医师培训站点和 1 个家庭医学教师社区实践中就诊的患者进行了回顾性图表审查。在就诊期间至少进行过一次皮肤活检的患者被纳入本研究。
在所有皮肤发现中,住院医师进行皮肤活检的发生率为 3.6%(258/7104),而主治医生为 1.8%(175/9917)(<0.001)。家庭医学住院医师进行的切除活检较少(57.8%比 77.7%,<0.001),而打孔活检较多(25.6%比 11.4%,<0.001)。与主治医生相比,住院医师和主治医生进行的大多数活检均为良性,但住院医师活检的良性病变显著更多(79.1%比 64.6%,<0.001),恶性病变也更多(11.2%比 5.7%,=0.049)。主治医生活检的低至中度异型病变(22.3%比 5.0%,<0.001)和高级别非典型病变(4.0%比 0.8%,=0.034)明显更多。
该住院医师网络中的家庭医学住院医师接受了各种皮肤活检类型的培训。住院医师和主治医生之间的皮肤活检实践和结果的差异可能反映了患者人群、临床专业知识和皮肤科转诊模式的差异。