Suppr超能文献

维奈托克联合小剂量阿糖胞苷,一种被遗忘的用于不符合强化化疗条件的急性髓系白血病患者的联合治疗方案:一项系统评价

Venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine, a forgotten combination in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review.

作者信息

Amador-Medina Lauro Fabián, Crespo-Solís Erick, Turrubiates-Hernández Francisco Javier, Santibañez-Bedolla Karla Edith

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Research Unit, OOAD Guanajuato, Mexican Social Security Institute, Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico; Department of Medicine and Nutrition, University of Guanajuato, Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.

Christus Muguerza Hospital Faro del Mayab, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.

出版信息

Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024 Dec;46 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S322-S331. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on the VIALE-A and VIALE-C studies, the Food and Drug Administration approved venetoclax in 2020 in combination with azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. After the publication of these studies, venetoclax/azacitidine was assumed to be superior to venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine; however, these studies were not designed to demonstrate superiority between these combinations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to describe overall survival, complete remission rate, and composite complete remission rate to assess response of these two regimens in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for retrospective studies and complete remission, composite complete remission, and overall survival rates were recorded.

RESULTS

Only 11 of the 815 publications identified were eligible to be included n this review, ten studies evaluated the venetoclax/azacitidine combination and one study evaluated the venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine combination. The median overall survival for venetoclax/azacitidine was 10.75 months, whereas for venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine the median overall survival had not been reached at the time of publication. Composite complete remission was 63.3 % for venetoclax/azacitidine and 90 % for venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine. Adverse events were similar for both combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A limited number of studies investigating the venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine combination exist. Based on the available data, the superiority of venetoclax/azacitidine over venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine cannot be assumed for all acute myeloid leukemia patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Venetoclax/low-dose cytarabine can still be considered as an option for the drug combinations currently under investigation.

摘要

背景

基于VIALE - A和VIALE - C研究,美国食品药品监督管理局于2020年批准维奈克拉与阿扎胞苷或小剂量阿糖胞苷联合用于治疗不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病患者。这些研究发表后,维奈克拉/阿扎胞苷被认为优于维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷;然而,这些研究并非旨在证明这些联合方案之间的优越性。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,以描述总生存期、完全缓解率和复合完全缓解率,从而评估这两种方案对新诊断的不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病患者的疗效。

材料与方法

检索PubMed和Web of Science数据库中的回顾性研究,并记录完全缓解率、复合完全缓解率和总生存率。

结果

在检索到的815篇文献中,仅有11篇符合纳入本评价的标准,其中10项研究评估了维奈克拉/阿扎胞苷联合方案,1项研究评估了维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷联合方案。维奈克拉/阿扎胞苷的中位总生存期为10.75个月,而维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷在发表时中位总生存期尚未达到。维奈克拉/阿扎胞苷的复合完全缓解率为63.3%,维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷为90%。两种联合方案的不良事件相似。

结论

研究维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷联合方案的研究数量有限。基于现有数据,对于所有不适合强化化疗的急性髓系白血病患者,不能认定维奈克拉/阿扎胞苷优于维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷。维奈克拉/小剂量阿糖胞苷仍可被视为目前正在研究的联合用药方案之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6539/11726088/17f038793c82/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验