Department of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Competence Center for Occupational Safety and Health Maintenance (CCAG) of the General Hospital of Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Nov;136(21-22):608-618. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02446-x. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
Early exercise intervention studies showed promising positive effects of physical exercising on post-COVID-19 symptoms; however, little is known about long-term training adherence and what influences it.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants of the 8‑week original exercise intervention study. Facilitators and barriers were identified via thematic analysis and compared between those participants who continued their regular exercise behavior (continuous exercise group, CEG, n = 7) and those who stopped exercising (discontinuous exercise group, DEG, n = 10). Physical performance parameters and questionnaires regarding psychological health dimensions and work ability were assessed analogously to the original study.
Qualitative analysis showed that two of the top three facilitators, (improving physical and mental health, sport has high priority) were the same in both groups. The respective third of the top three facilitators was (re)build physical and cognitive performance in the CEG and training in the group in the DEG. The top three barriers (exhaustion, sport has little priority, procrastination) were not only the same in both groups but also in the same order.
The strongest post-COVID-19 associated facilitator for long-term exercise adherence is when the need for further reconditioning is felt. The strongest post-COVID-19 associated barrier is exhaustion. Availability of exercising in a group is a key factor in increasing long-term exercise adherence.
早期的运动干预研究表明,体育锻炼对新冠后症状有积极的影响;然而,对于长期的训练坚持以及影响因素知之甚少。
对参加 8 周原始运动干预研究的 17 名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。通过主题分析确定了促进因素和障碍因素,并将继续进行常规运动行为的参与者(持续运动组,CEG,n=7)和停止运动的参与者(间断运动组,DEG,n=10)进行了比较。类似于原始研究,评估了身体表现参数以及心理健康维度和工作能力的问卷。
定性分析表明,在两个组中,前三个促进因素中的两个(改善身心健康,运动具有高优先级)是相同的。在 CEG 中,各自的前三个促进因素中的第三个是(重新)建立身体和认知表现,而在 DEG 中是在小组中进行训练。前三个障碍(疲劳、运动优先级低、拖延)不仅在两个组中相同,而且顺序也相同。
与新冠后长期运动坚持相关的最强促进因素是当感到需要进一步恢复时。与新冠后相关的最强障碍是疲劳。在小组中进行锻炼的可能性是增加长期运动坚持的关键因素。