Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, GHH Hospital, Le Havre, France.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 4;24(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02712-5.
Working long consecutive hours' is common for anaesthesia and critical care physicians. It is associated with impaired medical reasoning's performance of anaesthesiology and serious medical errors. However, no study has yet investigated the impact of working long consecutive hours' on medical reasoning.
The present study evaluated the impact of working long consecutive hours' on the medical reasoning's performance of anaesthesiology and intensive care physicians (residents and seniors).
This multicentric, prospective, cross-over study was conducted in 5 public hospitals of Normandy region. Two groups of anaesthesia and critical care physicians were formed. One was in a rest group, RG (after a 48-hours weekend without hospital work) and the other in Sleep Deprivation Group (SDG) after a 24 h-consecutives-shift. Changes in medical reasoning's performance were measured by 69-items script concordance tests (SCT) through to the two tests. Group A completed the first part of the assessment (Set A) after a weekend without work and the second part (Set B) after a 24 h-shift; group B did the same in reverse order. The primary outcome was medical reasoning's performance as measured by SCT in RG and SDG. The secondary outcomes included association between the performance with the demographic data, variation of the KSS (Karolinska sleepiness scale) daytime alertness score, the number of 24 h-shift during the previous 30 days, the vacations during the previous 30 days, the presence of more or less than 4 h consecutives hours slept, the management of a stressful event during the shift, the different resident years, the place where the shift took place (University hospital or general hospitals) and the type of shift (anaesthesia or intensive care).
84 physicians (26 physicians and 58 residents) were included. RG exhibited significantly higher performance scores than SDG (68 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 9, respectively; p = 0.008). We found a negative correlation between the number of 24 h-shifts performed during the previous month and the variation of medical reasoning's performance and no significant variation between professionals who slept 4 h or less and those who slept more than 4 h consecutively during the shift (-4 ± 11 vs. -2 ± 11; p = 0.42).
Our study suggests that medical reasoning' performance of anaesthesiologists, measured by the SCT, is reduced after 24 h-shift than after rest period. Working long consecutive hours' and many shifts should be avoided to prevent the occurrence of medical errors.
长时间连续工作对于麻醉和重症监护医师来说很常见。它与麻醉学医学推理表现受损和严重医疗错误有关。然而,目前还没有研究调查长时间连续工作对医学推理的影响。
本研究评估了长时间连续工作对麻醉和重症监护医师(住院医师和高年资医师)医学推理表现的影响。
这是一项多中心、前瞻性、交叉研究,在诺曼底地区的 5 家公立医院进行。将两组麻醉和重症监护医师分为休息组(RG)和睡眠剥夺组(SDG)。RG 组在周末休息 48 小时后,SDG 组在连续 24 小时轮班后进行测试。通过 69 项脚本一致性测试(SCT)测量医学推理表现的变化。组 A 在周末休息后完成第一部分评估(Set A),然后在 24 小时轮班后完成第二部分评估(Set B);组 B 则以相反的顺序进行。主要结局是 RG 和 SDG 中 SCT 测量的医学推理表现。次要结局包括表现与人口统计学数据、卡氏睡眠量表(KSS)白天警觉评分变化、过去 30 天内的 24 小时轮班次数、过去 30 天的休假、连续 4 小时以上睡眠时间的变化、轮班期间压力事件的处理、不同住院医师年限、轮班地点(大学医院或综合医院)和轮班类型(麻醉或重症监护)之间的关系。
共纳入 84 名医师(26 名医师和 58 名住院医师)。RG 的表现评分明显高于 SDG(分别为 68±8 与 65±9,p=0.008)。我们发现,过去一个月内进行的 24 小时轮班次数与医学推理表现的变化呈负相关,而在轮班期间睡眠时间为 4 小时或以下的专业人员与睡眠时间超过 4 小时的专业人员之间无显著差异(分别为-4±11 与-2±11,p=0.42)。
本研究表明,通过 SCT 测量,麻醉医师的医学推理表现在 24 小时轮班后比休息后下降。应避免长时间连续工作和轮班,以防止医疗错误的发生。