Ruas Cassio V, Taylor Janet L, Latella Christopher, Haff G Gregory, Nosaka Kazunori
School of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar;125(3):671-686. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05626-9. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
We compared voluntary drive and corticospinal responses during eccentric (ECC), isometric (ISOM) and concentric (CON) muscle contractions to shed light on neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning the lower voluntary drive in a greater force production in ECC than other contractions.
Sixteen participants (20-33 years) performed ISOM and isokinetic (30°/s) CON and ECC knee extensor contractions (110°-40° knee flexion) in which electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from vastus lateralis. Voluntary activation (VA) was measured during ISOM, CON and ECC maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and corticospinal silent periods (CSP) during MVCs and submaximal (30%) contractions, and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in submaximal contractions.
MVC torque was greater (P < 0.01) during ECC (302.6 ± 90.0 Nm) than ISOM (269.8 ± 81.5 Nm) and CON (235.4 ± 78.6 Nm), but VA was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (68.4 ± 14.9%) than ISOM (78.3 ± 13.1%) and CON (80.7 ± 15.4%). In addition, EMG/torque was lower (P < 0.02) for ECC (1.9 ± 1.1 μVNm) than ISOM (2.2 ± 1.2 μV.Nm) and CON (2.7 ± 1.6 μVNm), CSP was shorter (p < 0.04) for ECC (0.097 ± 0.03 s) than ISOM (0.109 ± 0.02 s) and CON (0.109 ± 0.03 s), and MEP amplitude was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (3.46 ± 1.67 mV) than ISOM (4.21 ± 2.33 mV) and CON (4.01 ± 2.06 mV). Similar results were found for EMG/torque and CSP during 30% contractions, but MEP and SICI showed no differences among contractions (p > 0.05).
The lower voluntary drive indicated by reduced VA during ECC may be partly explained by lower corticospinal excitability, while the shorter CSP may reflect extra muscle spindle excitation of the motoneurons from vastus lateralis muscle lengthening.
我们比较了离心(ECC)、等长(ISOM)和向心(CON)肌肉收缩过程中的自主驱动和皮质脊髓反应,以阐明在ECC中比其他收缩方式产生更大力量时较低自主驱动背后的神经生理机制。
16名参与者(20 - 33岁)进行了ISOM以及等速(30°/s)的CON和ECC膝关节伸展收缩(膝关节从110°屈曲至40°),在此过程中记录股外侧肌的肌电图活动(EMG)。在ISOM、CON和ECC最大自主收缩(MVC)期间测量自主激活(VA)。经颅磁刺激在MVC和次最大(30%)收缩期间诱发运动诱发电位(MEP)和皮质脊髓静息期(CSP),并在次最大收缩期间测量短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)。
ECC(302.6±90.0 Nm)期间的MVC扭矩大于ISOM(269.8±81.5 Nm)和CON(235.4±78.6 Nm)(P < 0.01),但ECC(68.4±14.9%)的VA低于ISOM(78.3±13.1%)和CON(80.7±15.4%)(P < 0.01)。此外,ECC(1.9±1.1 μV/Nm)的EMG/扭矩低于ISOM(2.2±1.2 μV/Nm)和CON(2.7±1.6 μV/Nm)(P < 0.02),ECC(0.097±0.03 s)的CSP短于ISOM(0.109±0.02 s)和CON(0.109±0.03 s)(P < 0.04),ECC(3.46±1.67 mV)的MEP波幅低于ISOM(4.21±2.33 mV)和CON(4.01±2.06 mV)(P < 0.01)。在30%收缩期间,EMG/扭矩和CSP也有类似结果,但MEP和SICI在不同收缩方式之间无差异(P > 0.05)。
ECC期间VA降低所表明的较低自主驱动可能部分由较低的皮质脊髓兴奋性解释,而较短的CSP可能反映了股外侧肌长度增加对运动神经元额外的肌梭兴奋。