• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内介入治疗颈动脉破裂综合征及复发的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。

Endovascular intervention for carotid blowout syndrome and predictors of recurrence: A retrospective and multicenter cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;246:108584. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108584. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108584
PMID:39368393
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potentially life-threatening complication of head and neck cancer and associated treatment. In this study, we assess the safety and efficacy of deconstructive and reconstructive procedures with a focus on CBS recurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 80 consecutive neurointerventions for CBS from 2016 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: deconstructive embolization (68 patients) and reconstructive stenting (12 patients). A comparative analysis was performed between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CBS recurrence rate was 23.8 % with 84.2 % of recurrences occurring within 90 days of the primary event. The median time to rebleeding was 8.0 days (IQR: 2.0 - 28.5) with a mortality rate of 26.3 %. There was no significant difference in rates of peri-operative ischemic stroke (1.5 % vs. 0 %, p=0.672) or peri-operative mortality (1.5 % vs. 0 %, p=0.670). CBS recurrence was significantly higher in the reconstructive group (58.3 % vs. 17.6 %, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, reconstructive stenting independently predicted rebleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 8.31, 95 % CI: 2.34-29.59, p=0.001). There was no significant association between CBS recurrence and pre-operative (p=0.600) or post-operative (p=0.275) anticoagulant/antiplatelet use.

CONCLUSION

CBS remains a challenging and potentially catastrophic complication of head and neck cancers. Reconstructive procedures, including stenting, predicted CBS recurrence independent of bleeding site or tumor invasion. Postoperative surveillance based on time intervals to CBS recurrence and engineering advancements including improved vessel reconstruction devices have the potential to reduce rehemorrhage rates and improve patient outcomes. Further clinical investigations amongst larger cohorts are needed.

摘要

简介

颈动脉破裂综合征(CBS)是头颈部癌症及其相关治疗的一种潜在致命并发症。在本研究中,我们评估了以 CBS 复发为重点的解构和重建手术的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行了多中心回顾性分析,并确定了 2016 年至 2020 年期间 80 例连续的 CBS 神经介入治疗。患者分为两组:解构性栓塞(68 例)和重建性支架(12 例)。对两组进行了对比分析。

结果

CBS 的复发率为 23.8%,84.2%的复发发生在初次事件后 90 天内。再出血的中位时间为 8.0 天(IQR:2.0-28.5),死亡率为 26.3%。围手术期缺血性卒中发生率(1.5%比 0%,p=0.672)或围手术期死亡率(1.5%比 0%,p=0.670)无显著差异。重建组 CBS 复发率明显较高(58.3%比 17.6%,p=0.002)。多变量分析显示,重建性支架独立预测再出血(调整后的危险比 8.31,95%CI:2.34-29.59,p=0.001)。CBS 复发与术前(p=0.600)或术后(p=0.275)抗凝/抗血小板使用无显著相关性。

结论

CBS 仍然是头颈部癌症的一种具有挑战性且潜在灾难性的并发症。包括支架置入在内的重建手术独立于出血部位或肿瘤侵袭预测 CBS 复发。基于 CBS 复发时间间隔和工程进展的术后监测,包括改进的血管重建装置,有可能降低再出血率并改善患者预后。需要进一步进行更大队列的临床研究。

相似文献

1
Endovascular intervention for carotid blowout syndrome and predictors of recurrence: A retrospective and multicenter cohort study.血管内介入治疗颈动脉破裂综合征及复发的预测因素:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;246:108584. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108584. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome.颈动脉破裂综合征的血管内治疗
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.024.
3
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
4
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
5
What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?膝关节弥漫型腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者行多入路关节镜下滑膜切除术的复发率、并发症及功能结局如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1218-1229. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002934. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
6
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub2.
7
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
10
Comparative meta-analysis of microsurgery versus endovascular therapy and bypass versus nonbypass techniques for blister-like aneurysms: enigmas of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery.泡状动脉瘤显微手术与血管内治疗以及搭桥与非搭桥技术的比较荟萃分析:床突上段颈内动脉之谜
J Neurosurg. 2025 Feb 21;143(1):243-254. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.JNS232241. Print 2025 Jul 1.