• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较年轻人佩戴在非优势手腕和腰部的 ActiGraph 加速度计的基于步幅的指标。

Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults.

机构信息

Division of Sport and Exercise, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2024 Sep;42(17):1664-1672. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2404784. Epub 2024 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1080/02640414.2024.2404784
PMID:39369332
Abstract

Step counts can be estimated from wrist-worn accelerometers through the Verisense Step Count Algorithm. No study has assessed agreement between stepping metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers during free-living. Thirty-four participants (age: 22.9 ± 3.4 years) provided 24 h accelerometer data (non-dominant wrist) and waist. Agreement of two Verisense Algorithms (Verisense 1 & 2) for estimating daily steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), peak 1-min and 30-min accumulated steps, against the waist and ActiLife step-count Algorithm was assessed. Mean bias ± 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for daily steps was +1255 ± 3780 steps/day (mean absolute percent error (MAPE): 21%) (Verisense 1) and +1357 ± 3434 steps/day (MAPE: 20%) (Verisense 2). For peak 1-min accumulated steps, mean bias and 95% LoA was -17 ± 23 steps/min (MAPE: 17%) (Verisense 1) and -6 ± 5 steps/min (MAPE: 9%) with Verisense 2. For peak 30-min accumulated steps, mean bias and 95% LoA was -12 ± 45 steps/min (MAPE: 25%) (Verisense 1) and -2 ± 38 steps/min (MAPE: 13%) (Verisense 2). For MVPA steps/day, mean bias and 95% LoA was -1450 ± 3194 steps/day (MAPE: 420%) (Verisense 1) and -844 ± 2571 steps/day (MAPE: 211%) (Verisense 2). For MVPA min/day, mean bias and 95% LoA was -13 ± 27 min/day (MAPE: 368%) (Verisense 1) and -8 ± 24 min/day (MAPE: 209%) (Verisense 2). The Verisense 2 algorithm enhanced agreement for stepping intensity metrics but further refinement is needed to enhance agreement for MVPA against the waist.

摘要

可以通过 Verisense 计步算法从佩戴在手腕上的加速度计估算步数。目前尚无研究评估在自由活动期间,ActiGraph 加速度计的计步指标是否具有一致性。34 名参与者(年龄:22.9±3.4 岁)提供了 24 小时加速度计数据(非优势手腕)和腰部数据。评估了两种 Verisense 算法(Verisense 1 和 2)估计每日步数、中高强度体力活动(MVPA)、1 分钟和 30 分钟峰值累计步数、与腰部和 ActiLife 计步算法的一致性。每日步数的平均偏差(bias)±95%一致性界限(LoA)分别为+1255±3780 步/天(平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE):21%)(Verisense 1)和+1357±3434 步/天(MAPE:20%)(Verisense 2)。对于 1 分钟峰值累计步数,平均偏差和 95% LoA 为-17±23 步/分钟(MAPE:17%)(Verisense 1)和-6±5 步/分钟(MAPE:9%),而 Verisense 2 的值分别为-6±5 步/分钟(MAPE:9%)。对于 30 分钟峰值累计步数,平均偏差和 95% LoA 为-12±45 步/分钟(MAPE:25%)(Verisense 1)和-2±38 步/分钟(MAPE:13%)(Verisense 2)。对于 MVPA 每日步数,平均偏差和 95% LoA 为-1450±3194 步/天(MAPE:420%)(Verisense 1)和-844±2571 步/天(MAPE:211%)(Verisense 2)。对于 MVPA 每日分钟数,平均偏差和 95% LoA 为-13±27 分钟/天(MAPE:368%)(Verisense 1)和-8±24 分钟/天(MAPE:209%)(Verisense 2)。Verisense 2 算法提高了计步强度指标的一致性,但需要进一步改进以提高与腰部相比的 MVPA 一致性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of stepping-based metrics from ActiGraph accelerometers worn concurrently on the non-dominant wrist and waist among young adults.比较年轻人佩戴在非优势手腕和腰部的 ActiGraph 加速度计的基于步幅的指标。
J Sports Sci. 2024 Sep;42(17):1664-1672. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2024.2404784. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
2
Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm.借助GGIR提升:使用Verisense步数计算算法从腕戴式研究级加速度计得出的步频的有效性。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Oct;40(19):2182-2190. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2147134. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Stepping towards More Intuitive Physical Activity Metrics with Wrist-Worn Accelerometry: Validity of an Open-Source Step-Count Algorithm.腕戴加速度计迈向更直观的体力活动指标:开源计步算法的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 18;22(24):9984. doi: 10.3390/s22249984.
4
A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist.对佩戴在优势手腕和非优势手腕上的Actigraph GT3X+加速度计所记录的身体活动进行比较。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019 Jan;39(1):51-56. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12538. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study.腕戴活动追踪器和移动应用程序在评估高中生身体活动方面是否有效?Wearfit 研究。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Sep 1;21(3):356-375. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.356. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.腕戴式Fitbit Flex与腰戴式ActiGraph在测量自由生活成年人步数方面的比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172535. eCollection 2017.
7
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
8
Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.在自由生活环境下,对 Apple Watch 和 Fitbit 监测器的综合比较。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251975. eCollection 2021.
9
Agreement of Step-Based Metrics From ActiGraph and ActivPAL Accelerometers Worn Concurrently Among Older Adults.老年人同时佩戴ActiGraph和ActivPAL加速度计的基于步数指标的一致性
J Meas Phys Behav. 2022 Dec;5(4):242-251. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2022-0001. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.从佩戴在腕部的 ActiGraph 加速度计在自由生活的成年人中确定活动强度的切点的开发。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2569-2578. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244. Epub 2020 Jul 17.