Suppr超能文献

目前直肠癌患者接受超全直肠系膜切除术的围手术期护理:与结直肠癌术后加速康复方案有哪些差异?

Current perioperative care in patients undergoing a beyond total mesorectal excision procedure for rectal cancer: What are the differences with the colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery protocol?

作者信息

Nordkamp Stefi, Ketelaers Stijn H J, Piqeur Floor, Scholten Harm J, van de Calseijde Silvie, Tolenaar Jip L, Nieuwenhuijzen Grard A P, Rutten Harm J T, Burger Jacobus W A, Bloemen Johanne G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of GROW, School for Developmental Biology & Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2024 Nov;26(11):1903-1912. doi: 10.1111/codi.17183. Epub 2024 Oct 6.

Abstract

AIM

Patients requiring a beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) will probably benefit from enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in such groups of patients is considered challenging. The aims of this study were to evaluate ERAS-related outcomes of patients with LARC or LRRC undergoing bTME and to investigate the possibility of designing a tailored ERAS protocol.

METHOD

This study was divided into four phases. Phase one consisted of a literature study to compare functional recovery and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. In phase two, outcomes on ERAS care elements in bTME were retrospectively evaluated. In phase three, differences in ERAS-related outcomes and compliance of the colorectal ERAS protocol in patients who had undergone bTME were studied. In phase four, multidisciplinary team meetings were held to develop an ERAS protocol for bTME patients.

RESULTS

Seven studies reported on ERAS-related outcomes in patients undergoing bTME. Median length of hospital stay was 9-19 days, median stay in the intensive care unit was 2-4 days and 30-day postoperative major complication rates were 22.6%-61.3%. Seventy-five bTME patients were included for retrospective analysis. In these patients, length of stay was 9.0 days and major postoperative complications were observed in 40.0%. The overall ERAS compliance was 44.4%. Compared with the colorectal ERAS protocol, the largest differences in management were observed in the use of epidural anaesthesia, the postoperative use of urethral catheters, oral intake and mobilization.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC are substantially different from patients treated with the colorectal ERAS protocol, regarding ERAS-related outcomes. A tailored, multimodal ERAS protocol with specific modifications was developed by an expert multidisciplinary team for patients undergoing bTME for LARC or LRRC.

摘要

目的

对于局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)和局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC)患者,可能需要进行超全直肠系膜切除术(bTME),这些患者可能会从术后加速康复(ERAS)方案中获益。然而,在这类患者中实施ERAS方案被认为具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估接受bTME的LARC或LRRC患者的ERAS相关结局,并探讨设计定制化ERAS方案的可能性。

方法

本研究分为四个阶段。第一阶段包括文献研究,以比较接受bTME患者的功能恢复情况和术后结局。在第二阶段,对bTME中ERAS护理要素的结局进行回顾性评估。在第三阶段,研究接受bTME患者的ERAS相关结局差异以及结直肠ERAS方案的依从性。在第四阶段,召开多学科团队会议,为bTME患者制定ERAS方案。

结果

七项研究报告了接受bTME患者的ERAS相关结局。中位住院时间为9 - 19天,中位重症监护病房停留时间为2 - 4天,术后30天主要并发症发生率为22.6% - 61.3%。纳入75例bTME患者进行回顾性分析。这些患者的住院时间为9.0天,术后主要并发症发生率为40.0%。总体ERAS依从性为44.4%。与结直肠ERAS方案相比,在硬膜外麻醉的使用、术后尿道导管的使用、口服摄入和活动方面观察到管理上的最大差异。

结论

就ERAS相关结局而言,接受bTME治疗的LARC或LRRC患者与接受结直肠ERAS方案治疗的患者有很大不同。一个由多学科专家团队为接受bTME治疗的LARC或LRRC患者制定了经过特定修改的定制化多模式ERAS方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验