Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0520, United States.
J Med Chem. 2024 Oct 24;67(20):18478-18490. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01781. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
SARS-CoV-2 propagation under nirmatrelvir and ensitrelvir pressure selects for main protease (MPro) drug-resistant mutations E166V (DRM2), L50F/E166V (DRM3), E166A/L167F (DRM4), and L50F/E166A/L167F (DRM5). DRM2-DRM5 undergoes N-terminal autoprocessing to produce mature MPro with dimer dissociation constants () 2-3 times larger than that of the wildtype. Co-selection of L50F restores catalytic activity of DRM2 and DRM4 from ∼10 to 30%, relative to that of the wild-type enzyme, without altering . Binding affinities and thermodynamic profiles that parallel the drug selection pressure, exhibiting significant decreases in affinity through entropy/enthalpy compensation, were compared with GC373. Reorganization of the active sites due to mutations observed in the inhibitor-free DRM3 and DRM4 structures as compared to MPro may account for the reduced binding affinities, although DRM2 and DRM3 complexes with ensitrelvir are almost identical to MPro-ensitrelvir. Chemical reactivity changes of the mutant active sites due to differences in electrostatic and protein dynamics effects likely contribute to losses in binding affinities.
在奈玛特韦和恩赛特韦的压力下,SARS-CoV-2 的传播会选择主要蛋白酶(MPro)耐药突变 E166V(DRM2)、L50F/E166V(DRM3)、E166A/L167F(DRM4)和 L50F/E166A/L167F(DRM5)。DRM2-DRM5 经历 N 端自加工,产生成熟的 MPro,其二聚体解离常数()比野生型大 2-3 倍。L50F 的共同选择恢复了 DRM2 和 DRM4 的催化活性,相对于野生型酶,其活性约为 10-30%,而不改变。结合亲和力和热力学特征与药物选择压力平行,通过熵/焓补偿表现出显著的亲和力降低,与 GC373 进行了比较。与 MPro 相比,无抑制剂的 DRM3 和 DRM4 结构中观察到的活性位点的突变导致活性位点的重新排列,可能导致结合亲和力降低,尽管 DRM2 和 DRM3 与恩赛特韦的复合物与 MPro-恩赛特韦几乎相同。由于静电和蛋白质动力学效应的差异,突变活性位点的化学反应性变化可能导致结合亲和力的丧失。