Nasim Sahra, Nasim Henna, Kauke Martin, Safi Ali-Farid
Medical Faculty of the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Front Surg. 2024 Sep 20;11:1410162. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1410162. eCollection 2024.
Autologous fat grafting for temporal augmentation is increasingly popular in aesthetic surgery. However, its high absorption rate, unpredictable volume retention rate, and potential safety risks are significant drawbacks. Evaluation methods for the fat graft survival rate, especially volume retention in the temporal area, vary widely and tend to be more subjective than objective. Therefore, this systematic review aims to analyze the unpredictable volume retention rate, associated safety concerns, and the various assessment strategies following autologous fat grafting for cosmetic temporal augmentation.
We conducted a systematic review of manuscripts listed in the MEDLINE/PubMed database on autologous fat grafting for cosmetic temporal augmentation. Articles had to be available in full text and written in English. Studies not presenting human data or not discussing cosmetic indications were excluded. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Eight articles were included. The average fat volume injected into each temporal region was 10.69 ml (range 6-17.5) on the right and 10.64 ml (range 5.9-17.4) on the left side. All included articles utilized photographic documentation before and after treatment, along with various questionnaires and scales (37.5% Likert Scale, 12.5% Hollowness Severity Rating Scale, 12.5% Visual Analogue Scale, 12.5% Allergan Temple Hollowing Scale). For objective assessment, one article (12.5%) used computed tomography, and another (12.5%) employed a three-dimensional scanning system to objectively evaluate fat graft survival.
Autologous fat grafting effectively addresses temporal hollowness, with high patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile. However, the variability in fat retention rates highlights the need for more controlled studies to establish reliable, validated methods for evaluating fat graft survival in the temporal area, and to further assess the safety of this procedure.
自体脂肪移植用于颞部填充在美容手术中越来越受欢迎。然而,其高吸收率、不可预测的体积保留率和潜在的安全风险是显著的缺点。脂肪移植存活率的评估方法,尤其是颞部区域的体积保留情况,差异很大,且往往主观多于客观。因此,本系统评价旨在分析自体脂肪移植用于美容性颞部填充后不可预测的体积保留率、相关安全问题以及各种评估策略。
我们对MEDLINE/PubMed数据库中列出的关于自体脂肪移植用于美容性颞部填充的手稿进行了系统评价。文章必须有全文且用英文撰写。未提供人体数据或未讨论美容适应症的研究被排除。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。
纳入了8篇文章。右侧每个颞部区域平均注入的脂肪体积为10.69毫升(范围6 - 17.5),左侧为10.64毫升(范围5.9 - 17.4)。所有纳入的文章都使用了治疗前后的照片记录,以及各种问卷和量表(37.5%为李克特量表,12.5%为凹陷严重程度评分量表,12.5%为视觉模拟量表,12.5%为爱力根颞部凹陷量表)。对于客观评估,一篇文章(12.5%)使用了计算机断层扫描,另一篇(12.5%)采用了三维扫描系统来客观评估脂肪移植的存活情况。
自体脂肪移植有效地解决了颞部凹陷问题,患者满意度高且安全性良好。然而,脂肪保留率的变异性凸显了需要进行更多对照研究,以建立可靠、经过验证的方法来评估颞部区域脂肪移植的存活情况,并进一步评估该手术的安全性。