Liang Nicole, Jewell Corlin M, Hekman Dann J, Shank Christopher, Schnapp Benjamin H
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison Wisconsin USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Oct 3;8(5):e11028. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11028. eCollection 2024 Oct.
There is a concern that provide increased extraneous cognitive load when paired with residents on shift. However, this may be offset by the decrease in extraneous load they may provide to the residents they are paired with by offloading basic patient care tasks. We hypothesized that these forces may not be balanced.
We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of PGY-2 emergency medicine residents and junior medical students at a single academic emergency department (ED) in the Midwest. A series of efficiency metrics (relative value unit [RVUs], patients per hour [PPH], time to note completion, and resident assignment to disposition [RATD]) as well as one quality metric (number of return ED visits; "bouncebacks") were compared for resident shifts in which a student was paired with the resident as well those in which no student was paired utilizing a regression model.
A total of 1844 records met the inclusion criteria (214 shifts with a paired medical student and 1630 without). After covariates were adjusted for, medical student shift status was a statistically significant predictor of increases in PPH ( < 0.0001) and RVUs ( = 0.0161) but was not significantly associated with RATD ( = 0.6941), log-time to note completion ( = 0.1604), or bounceback status ( = 0.9840). Shifts where residents were paired with medical students were predicted to see an additional 1.131 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660-1.602) PPH and produce an additional 1.923 RVUs (95% CI 1.130-3.273) per shift relative to shifts without medical students.
When junior medical students were paired with a PGY-2 resident on ED shifts, there was a significant increase in the PPH and RVUs generated when compared with shifts in which no medical student was paired with them.
有人担心,在与轮班住院医师搭档时会增加额外的认知负荷。然而,通过分担基本的患者护理任务,他们可能会减少给予搭档住院医师的额外负荷,从而抵消这一影响。我们推测这些因素可能并不平衡。
我们对美国中西部一家学术性急诊科的二年级急诊医学住院医师和低年级医学生进行了回顾性观察分析。使用回归模型比较了有学生与住院医师搭档的轮班以及没有学生搭档的轮班的一系列效率指标(相对价值单位[RVU]、每小时患者数[PPH]、记录完成时间以及住院医师处置分配[RATD])和一项质量指标(急诊复诊次数;“反弹”)。
共有1844条记录符合纳入标准(214次轮班有医学生搭档,1630次没有)。在对协变量进行调整后,医学生轮班状态是PPH增加(<0.0001)和RVU增加(=0.0161)的统计学显著预测因素,但与RATD(=0.6941)、记录完成的对数时间(=0.1604)或反弹状态(=0.9840)无显著关联。预计与没有医学生搭档的轮班相比,有医学生与住院医师搭档的轮班每班PPH额外增加1.131(95%置信区间[CI]0.660 - 1.602),每班额外产生1.923 RVU(95%CI 1.130 - 3.273)。
当低年级医学生在急诊科轮班时与二年级住院医师搭档,与没有医学生搭档的轮班相比,产生的PPH和RVU显著增加。