Kirby Ryan, Robinson Richard D, Dib Sasha, Mclarty Daisha, Shaikh Sajid, Cheeti Radhika, Ho Amy F, Schrader Chet D, Zenarosa Nestor R, Wang Hao
Department of Emergency Medicine Integrative Emergency Services John Peter Smith Health Network Fort Worth TX.
Department of Medical Education University of North Texas Health Science Center Fort Worth TX.
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Feb 27;3(3):209-217. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10327. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Provider efficiency has been reported in the literature but there is a lack of efficiency analysis among emergency medicine (EM) residents. We aim to compare efficiency of EM residents of different training levels and determine if EM resident efficiency is affected by emergency department (ED) crowding.
We conducted a single-center retrospective observation study from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. The number of new patients per resident per hour and provider-to-disposition (PTD) time of each patient were used as resident efficiency markers. A crowding score was assigned to each patient upon the patient's arrival to the ED. We compared efficiency among EM residents of different training levels under different ED crowding statuses. Dynamic efficiency changes were compared monthly through the entire academic year (July to next June).
The study enrolled a total of 150,920 patients. A mean of 1.9 patients/hour was seen by PGY-1 EM residents in comparison to 2.6 patients/hour by PGY-2 and -3 EM residents. Median PTD was 2.8 hours in PGY-1 EM residents versus 2.6 hours in PGY-2 and -3 EM residents. There were no significant differences in acuity across all patients seen by EM residents. When crowded conditions existed, residency efficiency increased, but such changes were minimized when the ED became overcrowded. A linear increase of resident efficiency was observed only in PGY-1 EM residents throughout the entire academic year.
Resident efficiency improved significantly only during their first year of EM training. This efficiency can be affected by ED crowding.
文献中已有关于医疗服务提供者效率的报道,但急诊医学(EM)住院医师之间缺乏效率分析。我们旨在比较不同培训水平的急诊医学住院医师的效率,并确定急诊医学住院医师的效率是否受急诊科(ED)拥挤情况的影响。
我们于2014年7月1日至2017年6月30日进行了一项单中心回顾性观察研究。将每位住院医师每小时接待的新患者数量和每位患者的从就诊到处置(PTD)时间用作住院医师效率指标。在患者抵达急诊科时为每位患者分配一个拥挤分数。我们比较了不同急诊科拥挤状态下不同培训水平的急诊医学住院医师之间的效率。在整个学年(7月至次年6月)每月比较动态效率变化。
该研究共纳入150,920名患者。一年级急诊医学住院医师平均每小时接待1.9名患者,而二年级和三年级急诊医学住院医师每小时接待2.6名患者。一年级急诊医学住院医师的PTD中位数为2.8小时,二年级和三年级急诊医学住院医师为2.6小时。急诊医学住院医师诊治的所有患者在病情严重程度上无显著差异。当存在拥挤情况时,住院医师效率会提高,但当急诊科过度拥挤时,这种变化会最小化。仅在一年级急诊医学住院医师整个学年中观察到住院医师效率呈线性增加。
住院医师效率仅在急诊医学培训的第一年有显著提高。这种效率可能受急诊科拥挤情况的影响。