Suttiratana Sakinah C, Kong Grace, Li Wei, Ouellette Rachel R, Balasuriya Lilanthi, Funaro Melissa, Arnold Cole, Krishnan-Sarin Suchitra
Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208093, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Curr Addict Rep. 2023 Dec;10(4):825-836. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00521-3. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
The objective of this scoping review is to use a health equity lens to understand the extent and type of evidence that exists about the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) based on socioecological understandings of health influences (i.e., the US National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities' (NIMHD) Research Framework). The research question guiding the review was as follows: What is the range and scope of research that exists to help characterize health disparities related to ENDS use?
Ninety-eight articles published between 2019 and 2022 often examined racial/ethnic differences in ENDS use; however, other demographic characteristics, domains of influence across the life course, and levels of influence beyond individuals were rarely considered. As most studies were derived from large-scale, cross-sectional US national surveys, few longitudinal studies or intervention trials were published.
The use of the NIMHD framework to analyze recent literature helped identify research patterns and gaps that may be important to recognize for optimizing population health strategies to advance health equity. Future research on non-individual level factors influencing ENDS, interventions to effectively use ENDS for combustible cigarette cessation, and subpopulations susceptible to dual use may enhance existing science. Monitoring research using the NIMHD research framework can help researchers and policy makers to identify and when appropriate, prioritize support for overlooked but important research questions.
本范围综述的目的是从健康公平的视角出发,基于对健康影响的社会生态理解(即美国国立少数族裔健康与健康差异研究所(NIMHD)的研究框架),了解有关电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)使用情况的现有证据的范围和类型。指导该综述的研究问题如下:有助于描述与ENDS使用相关的健康差异的现有研究范围和范畴是什么?
2019年至2022年间发表的98篇文章经常研究ENDS使用方面的种族/民族差异;然而,很少考虑其他人口统计学特征、生命历程中的影响领域以及个体之外的影响层面。由于大多数研究来自美国大规模的横断面全国性调查,很少有纵向研究或干预试验发表。
使用NIMHD框架分析近期文献有助于识别研究模式和差距,这对于优化促进健康公平的人群健康策略可能很重要。未来关于影响ENDS的非个体层面因素、有效使用ENDS来戒烟的干预措施以及易受双重使用影响的亚人群的研究,可能会丰富现有科学知识。使用NIMHD研究框架进行监测研究可以帮助研究人员和政策制定者识别,并在适当时优先支持被忽视但重要的研究问题。